All reviews copyright 1984-2015 Evelyn C. Leeper.
AN ANTHROPOLOGIST ON MARS by Oliver Sacks:
[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 10/08/2010]
AN ANTHROPOLOGIST ON MARS by Oliver Sacks (ISBN 978-0-679-43785-7) is a collection of essays on neurology and related fields. In "To See and Not See", about a man who regains his sight after almost an entire lifetime without it, Sacks quotes another researcher with a way of describing blindness that could have been the inspiration (but probably wasn't) for Ted Chiang's "Story of Your Life": "[Alberto] Valvo comments, 'The real difficulty here is that simultaneous perception of objects is an unaccustomed way to those used to sequential perception through touch.' We, with a full complement of senses, live in space and time; the blind live in a world of time alone."
The centerpiece of AN ANTHROPOLOGIST ON MARS is the title essay. "An Anthropologist on Mars" is by Oliver Sacks, but the title originates with its primary subject, Temple Grandin, an expert on animal behavior who is also perhaps the best-known "high-performing" person with autism. Sacks sees these two aspects of Grandin as somewhat paradoxical, since one of the effects of autism is that it makes it difficult--in fact, often impossible--for its victims to comprehend the meaning of many human behaviors. For example, someone with autism could see another person crying and not realize that meant that the person was sad (or, again paradoxically, happy). In fact, they might not even be able to explain what "sad" or "happy" was. Hence, Grandin describes herself as being like "an anthropologist on Mars." Not surprisingly, a lot of people with autism who are science fiction fans are big fans of Mr. Spock and Data in "Star Trek".
Autism has another (or perhaps it's really the same) aspect: people with autism see the world "slightly skewed". Grandin looks at the night sky and doesn't see (or even understand) any of the usual poetic images people without autism see. But this is not one-sided: what she sees is not something that those without autism can understand either.
All of this seems very connected to the whole idea of the Museum of
Jurassic Technology (which I described/reviewed in 2005 on my web
page at
Coincidentally, about a week after I read "An Anthropologist on
Mars", I saw the HBO film TEMPLE GRANDIN, which made clear a few
more details about being an anthropologist on Mars. The really key
point is that Grandin was the first person with autism to tell the
rest of us what life was like to people with autism--what they saw,
what they felt, how they thought. Throughout the film, you see
visual images of how Grandin's mind works, and you see a lot of
doctors and other "experts" on autism who are completely wrong in
what they believe.
Assume you are given a sequence of numbers and asked to provide the
next number. For example, "2, 4, 6". Is the next number 8 (the
nth term is 2n)? Is it 10 (the nth term is 2 times the nth
non-composite number, or the nth term is 1 less than the n<1th prime)?
Is there some other more complicated rule? That was the sort of
guesswork the doctors were doing. Grandin was able to tell them
the rules.
In science fiction terms, what we are seeing is a first contact
situation. By this, I don't mean that those with autism are a
separate species, but that their mode of thinking is so unusual
that there is a certain parallel to such a meeting. And rather
than just observing and guessing, people could ask Grandin (and
eventually others) what was going on in their minds. (For example,
one of the things people have said about teaching other primates
sign language is that we might be able to ask a gorilla why
gorillas beat their chests. Two-way communication is
irreplaceable.)
(The essay "To See and Not See" also has references to Borges in
its footnotes.)
THE ISLAND OF THE COLORBLIND
by Oliver Sacks:
[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 12/31/2010]
Coincidentally, I happened to read THE ISLAND OF THE COLORBLIND by
Oliver Sacks (ISBN 978-0-375-70073-6) at the same time as GENOME. This is
really two long essays: "The Island of the Colorblind" and "Cycad
Island". The latter never caught my imagination, but "The Island
of the Colorblind" fit in perfectly with GENOME. The "island" is
really two islands, Pingelap and Pohnpei, and then for good measure
Sacks visits two more (Guam and Rota) to study a family of
neurodegenerative diseases. And of these two sections, again it
was the first that was the most engaging. I think a large part of
that is that colorblindness is fairly easy to understand, both its
cause (a single gene) and its effect (everything looks various
shades of gray). While these are not entirely accurate statements,
they are not grossly inaccurate either. But lytico-bodig, which
produced wildly varying symptoms and which no one cause had been
agreed on, is just too elusive.
THE MAN WHO MISTOOK HIS WIFE FOR A HAT
by Oliver Sacks:
[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 03/18/2005]
Oliver Sacks's THE MAN WHO MISTOOK HIS WIFE FOR A HAT (ISBN
0-684-85394-9) is a collection of essays about various peculiar
neurological syndromes. The title essay is about a patient with
the inability to interpret visual images: show him a rose and he
cannot identify it as a rose, but let him smell it and he has no
problem. "The Lost Mariner" is about a man with retrograde
amnesia (a.k.a. Korsakov's syndrome). I can't remember if it
used the term, but that is what the film MEMENTO is about. I
would be surprised if the writer of that was not at least
partially inspired by Sacks. And this is not the only pop
culture derivative of Sacks's work. Just a few weeks ago, the
"B" story on "House, M.D." was almost precisely the case
described in "Cupid's Disease". (And the writers of "Medical
Investigation" seemed to have taken their pilot episode from
Berton Roueche's "Eleven Blue Men". This seems to be the season
for taking television plots from classic medical case histories.)
Michael Nyman has even written an opera based on Sacks's title
essay. At times the writing is a bit dense, but still readable.
(Roueche, mentioned earlier, wrote for a wider audience and is
somewhat easier to read. Paul de Kruif, with his MICROBE HUNTERS
and MEN AGAINST DEATH, predates both of them in this genre.)
The consensus among our book discussion group, however, was that
the descriptions of the cases were far more interesting than
Sacks's philosophizing about them.
Go to Evelyn Leeper's home page.