@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                     Club Notice - 08/17/90 -- Vol. 9, No. 7


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are on Wednesdays at noon.
            LZ meetings are in LZ 2R-158.  MT meetings are in the cafeteria.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       08/22   LZ: RENDEZVOUS WITH RAMA by Arthur C. Clarke
       09/12   LZ: STAR MAKER by Olaf Stapledon (Formative Influences)
       10/03   LZ: MICROMEGAS by Voltaire (Philosophy)
       10/24   LZ: THE WORM OUROBOROS by E. R. Eddison (Classic Horror)
       11/07   MT: WANDERING STARS ed. by Jack Dann (Jewish Science Fiction)
       11/14   LZ: WAR WITH THE NEWTS by Karel Capek (Foreign SF)

         _D_A_T_E                    _E_X_T_E_R_N_A_L _M_E_E_T_I_N_G_S/_C_O_N_V_E_N_T_I_O_N_S/_E_T_C.

       08/18   SFABC: Science Fiction Association of Bergen County: TBA
                       (phone 201-933-2724 for details) (Saturday)
       09/08   NJSFS: New Jersey Science Fiction Society: TBA
                       (phone 201-432-5965 for details) (Saturday)

       HO Chair:      John Jetzt     HO 1E-525   834-1563  hocpa!jetzt
       LZ Chair:      Rob Mitchell   LZ 1B-306   576-6106  mtuxo!jrrt
       MT Chair:      Mark Leeper    MT 3D-441   957-5619  mtgzx!leeper
       HO Librarian:  Tim Schroeder  HO 3E-301   949-4488  hotld!tps
       LZ Librarian:  Lance Larsen   LZ 3L-312   576-3346  mtunq!lfl
       MT Librarian:  Evelyn Leeper  MT 1F-329   957-2070  mtgzy!ecl
       Factotum:      Evelyn Leeper  MT 1F-329   957-2070  mtgzy!ecl
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. Charlie Harris offers this summary of  the  book  scheduled  for
       discussion at the 8/22 meeting in Lincroft:

       Maybe I should have learned to think  metric  back  when  that  was
       fashionable.   Maybe that would have given me a better appreciation
       for Arthur C. Clarke's _R_e_n_d_e_z_v_o_u_s _w_i_t_h _R_a_m_a.

       I do have a pretty good idea of how long a meter  is,  and  I  have
       guzzled my way to a pretty good grasp of two liters.  But I have no
       image whatever of a kilometer, much less 10 or 50 kilometers.   And
       vivid   quantitative   imagery  is  essential  for  the  reader  of











       THE MT VOID                                           Page 2



       _R_e_n_d_e_z_v_o_u_s _w_i_t_h _R_a_m_a.   Without it you miss  out  on  much  of  the
       sense  of wonder that Clarke expected to engender with his exacting
       descriptions of Rama--the  huge,  lifeless  alien  spacecraft  that
       drifts mysteriously into our solar system.  I did realize that it's
       huge, because on page 17 Clarke says that its mass is at least  ten
       trillion tons.  That's a lot of mass.  (Or is it metric tons rather
       than regular American tons?  Are tons of mass as  big  as  tons  of
       weight?  Why didn't I pay more attention in Physics 1?)

       After page 17, though, I was hopelessly out of it.  On page 36  the
       commander of the exploratory crew mentions that the entry tunnel is
       "half a  kilometer  long....about  the  thickness  of  the  shell."
       Pretty  thick  shell,  eh?   On  page 43 we learn that the interior
       cavity is 50 kilometers long and 16 wide.  Sounds  like  plenty  of
       room to stand up in and look around breathlessly.

       "Radiating from the central  hub,  120  degrees  apart,  are  three
       ladders  that  are almost a kilometer long."  Good thing there's no
       gravity to impede their traversal of the ladder--at least not until
       they've  gone some fraction of a kilometer away from the hub toward
       the outer hull of the  vessel  (spinning  at  "over  eight  hundred
       kilometers  an  hour").   Now  (page  44)  we  get to a really awe-
       inspiring  sight:   "the  ten-kilometer-wide  dark   band   running
       completely  around it at the halfway mark" which they christen "the
       Cylindrical Sea" because it appears to be made of ice  and  because
       "right  out  in  the  middle there's a large oval island, about ten
       kilometers long and three wide," which they christen New York.

       The commander realizes they are facing  a  daunting  task:   "We've
       four thousand square kilometers to explore, and only a few weeks to
       do it in."  I figure that they better  cover,  at  a  minimum,  143
       square  kilometers  a  day--however much that is.  In the distance,
       they can see several towns--"If they are towns." "And  the  nearest
       is  only eight kilometers away," says a crewmember hopefully.  Yes,
       thinks the commander, "but it's also eight kilometers back."   Even
       with my poor grasp of metrics, I believe that checks out.

       On page 80, only a kilometer to  the  right  of  their  exploratory
       path, he sights a "rather mysterious...long groove or trench, forty
       meters deep and a hundred wide...almost ten kilometers  long."   By
       page  120  he  has  found  out  what  the groove is for (it's not a
       canal), but now he's "clinging to the face of a  curving,  sixteen-
       kilometer-high cliff."  And he still has 183 pages to go.

       Perhaps by now you're wishing I'd say something about the  plot  of
       _R_e_n_d_e_z_v_o_u_s  _w_i_t_h  _R_a_m_a  instead  of just quoting more measurements.
       The problem is, there isn't much of a  plot.   The  little  ad  hoc
       crises and the cutaways to the petty politicking back in the United
       Planets  committee  meetings  seem  to  have   been   inserted   as
       perfunctory  padding  between  the fascinating statistics.  None of
       the characters is particularly captivating, and the puzzles  Clarke











       THE MT VOID                                           Page 3



       sets  for  them  and us are not very engaging.  Just about the only
       interesting action is some spectacular "weather"  inside  the  huge
       spacecraft  (e.g. violent winds with "velocities of between two and
       three hundred kilometers an hour").  The book's conclusion, and its
       "surprise" ending, fall flat.

       So how come _R_e_n_d_e_z_v_o_u_s _w_i_t_h _R_a_m_a won not only the Hugo and  Nebula,
       but  also the John W. Campbell Memorial Award and the Jupiter Award
       for 1973?  Peter Nichols,  in  his  _S_c_i_e_n_c_e  _F_i_c_t_i_o_n  _E_n_c_y_c_l_o_p_e_d_i_a,
       says:  "To what extent the book deserved it, and to what extent the
       awards merely celebrated the return to the field after many  years'
       comparative silence of a much loved figure, is unclear." [-ch]

       2. I guess I tend to assume that many of the animals we think of in
       nature  are also reasonably intelligent.  Once you have fought your
       way to the top of your food chain, your brains which are to the top
       of  your  body have room to expand up and then to scheme.  Take for
       example the Great White Shark in _J_a_w_s, who was so big and mean that
       nobody  dared pick on him or make fun of his looks.  He clearly was
       at the top of _h_i_s food chain.  And at the same time he was not only
       able  to  plan an effective attack campaign on that little boat but
       in scenes cut from the film in the final  editing,  also  played  a
       very  mean  game  of canasta.  The things in _A_l_i_e_n were pretty mean
       also and nobody ever had them in hollandaise sauce on toast points.

       Humans are almost an example also.  We are just one step  from  the
       top of the food chain ruled over by the New Jersey mosquito, and we
       tend as a species to be promising and bright but  still  listen  to
       Bruce   Springsteen   music.    My   understanding  is  that  Bruce
       Springsteen counts few, if any, New  Jersey  mosquitoes  among  his
       fans.

       But anyway, my point is that you tend to think of spiders as  being
       toward  the  top  of  their  particular food chain; at least indoor
       spiders are.  In my whole life I have eaten at most two  and  thank
       heavens  my Boy Scout days are over forever.  So I tend to think of
       spiders as being reasonably intelligent animals.  Not so,  however.
       I  mean  you'd  think  they've  got a pretty good thing going in my
       house.  I do not kill spiders and have never intentionally eaten  a
       campfire omelette flavored with one.  In return I would expect that
       the spiders in my house would be smart enought at least to stay out
       of  my  way.  But no, you give these little ladies an inch and they
       take eight feet.  (Yes, I don't mean to be sexist, but I  think  of
       the  spiders  in  my  house  as females.  The males are considerate
       enough not to make webs.  They are not mean like the females.   And
       they  end  up  being  a  quick  lunch for the females.  Not that _i_s
       sexist, if you ask me.)

       But I was telling you about this one spider in my  bathroom.   Very
       tiny.   She's wearing a T-shirt that says "Go climb a sesame seed."
       At least three times she has built a web in my bathroom right where











       THE MT VOID                                           Page 4



       I might step just before getting into the shower.  I guess when you
       are her size the side of the tub looks "majestic."  It  looks  like
       prime  real  estate  and  a great place to set up a little home and
       catch the occasional gnat who comes by just filled  with  luscious,
       wholesome  gnat juice.  Every morning I try to give her the message
       that she might get hurt homesteading in the Great Bathroom  Valley.
       I make my ugliest monster faces and rip up her web, droning:
                 Fee, fie, foo, fider.
                 I smell the blood of a gnat-sucking spider.
                 Since she's too small for me to ride 'er,
                 I'll drink her down with apple cider.
       She looks at me with those eight dewey eyes and giggles, then  runs
       to  hide  in  a  little  nook  while her house is demolished.  Next
       morning, there is that web again.  I don't  get  any  more  respect
       from  her than I get from Evelyn.  Maybe I can get a Boy Scout with
       spider on his breath to scare her.


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 957-5619
                                           ...mtgzx!leeper


            To be surprised, to wonder, is to begin to understand.  This
            is the sport, the luxury, special to the intellectual man.
                                          -- Jose Ortega y Gasset








































                                      FLATLINERS
                           A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                            Copyright 1990 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  An original and hypnotic horror
            film.  The music, the acting, the photography, and the
            script all get very high marks.  It is a horror film with
            intelligent characters who do things rather than have
            things done to them.  Strong on atmosphere and intriguing
            in ideas.  Rating: high +2.

            Horror films tend to be very derivative.  They take many of the
       same themes and rework them over and over.  How different is _F_r_i_g_h_t
       _N_i_g_h_t from _D_r_a_c_u_l_a really?  It is very rare for me to come out of a
       horror film feeling I had seen something really new for the horror film.
       And, be warned, usually when I feel have seen something new, most
       audiences do not like the films.  In the last ten years there have been
       five horror films I have liked in this way.  They are _S_o_m_e_t_h_i_n_g _W_i_c_k_e_d
       _T_h_i_s _W_a_y _C_o_m_e_s, _L_i_f_e_f_o_r_c_e, _P_r_i_n_c_e _o_f _D_a_r_k_n_e_s_s, _L_a_d_y _i_n _W_h_i_t_e, and now
       _F_l_a_t_l_i_n_e_r_s.  _F_l_a_t_l_i_n_e_r_s is a mesmerizing horror thriller about life and
       death and redemption.  From about two minutes into the film I was
       constantly anxious to find out what happens next.  And when it did
       happen, I was never disappointed but still never appeased.

            A group of medical students are fascinated by the  brink-of-death
       experience that some of their patients have had.  But their curiosity
       certainly goes beyond just collecting other peoples' accounts second-
       hand.  As long as they have the ability to induce death and to bring
       people back, why wait for it to happen by chance and to other people.
       Why not go off exploring the undiscovered country for themselves.  As
       one student says of the quest to know what is beyond death, "Philosophy
       failed.  Religion failed.  Now it's time for medical science to try."
       So one tries it and is brought back  But now things seem different to
       him and reality is not quite the same.

            At least in theme _F_l_a_t_l_i_n_e_r_s is reminiscent of some of the classic
       old Karloff films like Michael Curtiz's _T_h_e _W_a_l_k_i_n_g _D_e_a_d, and where that
       film was a little pat in its description of life after death (Karloff
       just had time to describe it as "peace" before dying a second time, and
       more permanently), this film is only a little less pat in other ways in
       its "meaning of death."  However, it is not concentrating so much on
       what the other side looks like as on what it is like to have been there
       and be back.

            This is a movie to see in a theater; it will lose a lot of its
       visual impact on the small screen.  Almost the entire film is shot in
       either twilight half-tones or at night.  The medical school has got to
       be the most baroque in the world.  It would have done credit to any
       1930s expressionistic horror film.  Its architecture is almost gothic











       Flatliners                  August 12, 1990                       Page 2



       with immense vaulting rooms; dark, dismal corridors; labs with immense
       statue heads as if gods were looking on.  Director Joel Schumacher's
       previous _T_h_e _L_o_s_t _B_o_y_s had little to recommend it but atmosphere.  This
       time he has better atmosphere and a far more compelling story to tell.

            Kiefer Sutherland (of _L_o_s_t _B_o_y_s) plays Nelson, who is exploring
       death partially for curiosity and partially for glory.  Julia Roberts is
       Rachel, who has her own private demons to face.  Roberts has the best
       developed character.  Keith Bacon is Davis, who is just a little too
       good to be true.  Alec Baldwin's younger brother William plays Joe,
       whose story is somewhat less interesting than the others and could by
       itself have been an episode of "The Hitchhiker."

            _F_l_a_t_l_i_n_e_r_s is intelligently filmed and written.  It has irony but
       happily not apparently tongue-in-cheek.  In short, it deserves to be a
       classic horror film and may well make it.  I rate it a high +2 on the -4
       to +4 scale.