@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 11/09/90 -- Vol. 9, No. 19


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are on Wednesdays at noon.
            LZ meetings are in LZ 2R-158.  MT meetings are in the cafeteria.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       11/14/90        LZ: WAR WITH THE NEWTS by Karel Capek (Foreign SF)
       12/05/90        LZ: EQUAL RITES or THE LIGHT FANTASTIC by Terry Pratchett
                       (Humorous SF)
       12/26/90        LZ: TOM SWIFT by Victor Appleton II (Juvenile SF)
       01/09/91        LZ: BRAIN WAVE by Poul Anderson
       01/30/91        LZ: RITE OF PASSAGE by Alexei Panshin
       02/20/91        LZ: MARTIANS, GO HOME! by Frederic Brown

         _D_A_T_E                    _E_X_T_E_R_N_A_L _M_E_E_T_I_N_G_S/_C_O_N_V_E_N_T_I_O_N_S/_E_T_C.

       11/10/90        SFABC: Science Fiction Association of Bergen County:
                       Constance Ash (author)
                       (phone 201-933-2724 for details) (Saturday)
       11/17/90        NJSFS: New Jersey Science Fiction Society: Barry Malzberg
                       (phone 201-432-5965 for details) (Saturday)

       HO Chair:      John Jetzt     HO 1E-525   834-1563  hocpa!jetzt
       LZ Chair:      Rob Mitchell   LZ 1B-306   576-6106  mtuxo!jrrt
       MT Chair:      Mark Leeper    MT 3D-441   957-5619  mtgzy!leeper
       HO Librarian:  Tim Schroeder  HO 3B-301   949-4488  hotsc!tps
       LZ Librarian:  Lance Larsen   LZ 3L-312   576-3346  mtunq!lfl
       MT Librarian:  Evelyn Leeper  MT 1F-329   957-2070  mtgzy!ecl
       Factotum:      Evelyn Leeper  MT 1F-329   957-2070  mtgzy!ecl
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. Karel Capek's classic _W_a_r _w_i_t_h _t_h_e _N_e_w_t_s will  be  discussed  in
       Lincroft Wednesday, November 14.  Nick Sauer offers these comments:

       _W_a_r _w_i_t_h _t_h_e _N_e_w_t_s is Karel Capek's story of  humanity's  discovery
       and   exploitation   of   a  race  of  sentient  salamanders.   The
       salamanders (the newts) are discovered on a South Pacific island by
       a  ship  captain  in 1926.  Not having any children of his own, the
       captain immediately takes the newts under his  wing.   This  action
       leads him to set up a partnership company that allows him to spread











       THE MT VOID                                           Page 2



       the  newts  to  other  islands  and  give  them  tools  to  protect
       themselves  in  exchange for pearls, which the newts provide to the
       captain.  The story finally shifts into high gear upon the death of
       the captain.  The partner of the company immediately begins selling
       the newts themselves as the ultimate undersea engineers.   At  this
       relatively  early  point  in  the  book the ending became painfully
       obvious  to  me.   Normally,  I  would  have  been  upset  for  the
       conclusion  being  so  transparent, but Capek did such an excellent
       job cataloging humanity's inane behaviour that the book remained  a
       pleasure to read.  Even after the inevitable conclusion was reached
       I found that I had no sympathy  for  the  human  race.   The  human
       beings collective stupidity made the bed that they now must lie in.

       Overall, this is one of the strongest novels I have read in a  long
       time.   The  reason  for  this  was  the  realism  with  which  the
       individual  characters,  the  societies,  and  even  the   national
       governments behave.  Capek obviously understood the human race very
       well when he wrote this novel.  The actions of all  the  characters
       and  governments  follow an all too believable sequence.  Also, the
       newts themselves were well thought out by  Capek.   Their  physical
       characteristics,   social   structure,   and   behaviour  are  very
       reasonable and consistent.  This made their actions  very  easy  to
       predict.   I  am just glad that the newts were a fiction created by
       Capek.

       2.  I have good news for you and bad news for you.  Don't  worry--I
       am not telling you anything you didn't already know, but I am going
       to make it official.  The good news is that America won in Vietnam.
       Now  I  know  that  is  what  Richard Nixon was telling us.  But if
       memory serves me, Nixon shot his  credibility  over  certain  other
       things  that  were going on in his life at the time.  In fact, when
       Nixon said we won Vietnam he was really lying--one of the things he
       did  best--because  he  didn't know it at the time.  (I guess there
       always was that dual question with Nixon of what did  he  know  and
       _w_h_e_n _d_i_d _h_e _k_n_o_w _i_t?  But in this case I think we can be certain he
       thought we had lost because he said we had won.  Do you follow me?)

       Now I know what you are going to ask.   Didn't  the  government  of
       South  Vietnam  have  to  grab up all the gold and stuff they could
       carry and fly out in helicopters and try  to  start  new  lives  as
       television evangelists?  The answer is, "Yup!"  That one particular
       government lost.  It was America  that  won?   But  didn't  Ho  Chi
       Minh's minions take over the whole country?  Yup again.  Didn't all
       of Vietnam go Communist?  Yup again.  And I will tell you something
       else.   The  Domino  Theory  was  also proven true.  What we didn't
       realize at the time is that capitalists can afford bigger dominoes.
       Day by day, Communist ideology is crumbling in Hanoi.  You can rent
       government vehicles for weddings and hire government  photographers
       to  photograph  the wedding.  The July 23 _U. _S. _N_e_w_s & _W_o_r_l_d _R_e_p_o_r_t
       talked about this and had  a  photo  from  the  Miss  Hanoi  beauty
       pageant.   They have picked up some of our worst habits!  They want











       THE MT VOID                                           Page 3



       to get into international markets  and  they  want  their  old  war
       buddies,  the  Americans,  to help them.  I suppose they can always
       put some force behind their request by threatening to go Communist.
       But  in a lot of ways they are economically where Japan was in 1947
       and are asking for much the same sort of assistance as we gave  the
       Japanese.  Now tell me again we you think won the Vietnam War.

       Now the bad news.  The economic giants  of  the  world  in  another
       couple  of  years  are  going to be the United States, Japan, and a
       single economic unit in Europe which many people believe  is  going
       to  be  led  by  Germany.   Not  East  Germany or West Germany, but
       Germany.  Grab somebody from 1940, bring him forward in  time  some
       fifty  years,  tell  him that, then ask him who he thinks must have
       won World War II.

       3. Donald Wollheim, founder and publisher of DAW  books,  has  died
       after  a  long  illness.   He  was 76, and is survived by his wife,
       Betsy and their daughter, Elsie, both involved with DAW  books.   A
       leader  of  the  Futurians in the 30's, he was founder of FAPA, the
       Fantasy Amateur Press  Association.   He  edited  Stirring  Science
       Stories and Cosmic Stories, edited the SF line at Ace for 20 years,
       (during which time he brought out the uncopyrighted (but legal  due
       to  a  technicality)  version  of  Lord  of  the  Rings;  he  later
       legitimized it and paid the Tolkien estate royalties; he  was  also
       responsible  for  the  Ace  Doubles  and  Terry Carr's Ace Specials
       series).  He started his own imprint in 1972 and  published,  among
       other things, his "Best SF of the Year" anthology until this year.

       He was also a wonderful, friendly and open person who was never too
       busy  to  sit  and  talk.   He loved SF, he loved his family and he
       loved Fandom, which was his extended family.

       Don Wollheim, along with  the  Ballantines,  were  instrumental  in
       making  the  field  of Science Fiction a viable part of publishing.
       Don did his part to also make it good with the Ace Science  Fiction
       series  and  his  commitment  to  publishing what was different and
       good.  About two years ago he suffered a stroke  and  never  really
       recovered,  doing  what  he could from his bed with the help of his
       family.  He's been relieved of the suffering, but we've lost one of
       the important people who made SF and fandom good and special.

       [The preceding was provided by Chuq Von Rospach.]


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 957-5619
                                           ...mtgzy!leeper



            The defense of morals is the battle-cry which best
            rallies stupidity against change.
                                          -- Alfred North Whitehead













                                        AVALON
                           A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                            Copyright 1990 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  A loving portrait of a Jewish
            family in post-World-War-II Baltimore makes _A_v_a_l_o_n one of
            Barry Levinson's best films to date.  Levinson has a real
            talent for dialogue and for creating memorable
            characters.  This is a film to be enjoyed more than once.
            Rating: +3.

            Barry Levinson has made such diverse films as _T_h_e _N_a_t_u_r_a_l; _G_o_o_d
       _M_o_r_n_i_n_g, _V_i_e_t_n_a_m; and _R_a_i_n _M_a_n.  But he chronically returns to his
       native Baltimore to tell the stories of the people he knew when he was
       growing up.  His first film was the excellent _D_i_n_e_r.  _T_i_n _M_e_n was set in
       part in the same Baltimore diner, though the story was a cut below his
       first film.  _A_v_a_l_o_n is a very different Baltimore story and rivals _T_h_e
       _N_a_t_u_r_a_l as Levinson's best work.  _A_v_a_l_o_n follows the fortunes of an
       immigrant Jewish family in the years following World War II.  Central to
       the story is a grandfather-grandson relationship, very probably based on
       Levinson's relationship with his own grandfather.  The portrait of the
       family is at once realistic and endearing.  This is not so much a story
       with a single conflict that is resolved in the end, but more a chronicle
       told in episodes.

            As the film opens, we are in the mind and memory of Sam Krichinsky
       as he is remembering and relating to his grandchildren how he came to
       the United States in 1914 and settled in the beautiful city of
       Baltimore.  He arrived on July 4th and he is telling the story before
       dinner on Thanksgiving.  As the family history progresses, it returns
       again and again to what the family was doing on those two holidays.  The
       story is seen very much through the eyes of young Michael Kaye, Sam's
       grandson.  Levinson's Baltimore films all have excellent dialogue which
       is at the same time believable and surprisingly entertaining.  Just
       simple family chit-chat in Levinson's hands becomes both revealing and
       endearing.  Michael's father Jules is a salesman who is mugged in front
       of Michael.  To keep Jules entertained as he is recovering his cousin
       buys the family's first television set.  This leads to a whole new
       career of selling first televisions, then appliances at discount.  The
       success brings tragedy--at least as far as Michael is concerned: the
       family moves to the suburbs.  Soon conflicts arise that seem serious to
       the family, but which clearly seem petty and minor to the viewer.

            Armin Mueller-Stahl (who played a suspected Nazi in _T_h_e _M_u_s_i_c _B_o_x)
       plays the patriarchal Sam Krichinsky.  His son Jules is played by Aidan
       Quinn.  And Jules's son Michael is played by Elijah Wood.  Elizabeth
       Perkins and Joan Plowright help to round out the cast in this loving
       scrapbook of the life of a family.  This is certainly one of the most
       moving and best films this year.  I give it a +3 on the -4 to +4 scale.















                                    JACOB'S LADDER
                           A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                            Copyright 1990 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  Eerie Gordian knot of a horror film
            requires a lot of thought, but finally pays off in the
            car on the way home from the theater.  Give it a chance
            to sink in.  Murky photography used to even better
            advantage than in _F_l_a_t_l_i_n_e_r_s.  (Do not read the spoiler
            note at the end of this review if you have not seen the
            film.)  Rating: +2 (-4 to +4).

            Within the space of a few short months Bruce Joel Rubin has had two
       films he has written released.  Each deals with death.  _G_h_o_s_t had a few
       heavy horror moments but they were counter-acted by a lot of lighter and
       more pleasant moments.  "Pleasant," however, is not a term applicable to
       any single sequence in _J_a_c_o_b'_s _L_a_d_d_e_r.  While it probably has the more
       intelligent and demanding story, _J_a_c_o_b'_s _L_a_d_d_e_r is a Gordian knot of
       unpleasant concepts.  It is a story of disturbing horror requiring some
       effort and detective work to come to any consistent interpretation and
       then open to multiple interpretations.  This is one weird movie.

            It is October 6, 1971, and a company of American soldiers in
       Vietnam is getting ready to move into battle.  Suddenly something is
       going very wrong.  Some of the men are convulsing; others are running
       around fighting as if an enemy, whom we do not see, is right there on
       top of them.  One of the soldiers, Jacob (played by Tim Robbins), is
       bayonetted in the stomach and left for dead.  Flash forward several
       years and Jacob is a postman living in a surrealistically squalid New
       York City.  Sights that the audience finds ugly or even terrifying seem
       commonplace in Jacob's everyday existence.  But things are happening
       that are not commonplace for Jacob.  Something is stalking Jacob, or
       perhaps someone who can call up faceless demons.  And, as if that were
       not enough, the world seems to be deteriorating and people are mutating
       in some mysterious ways that only Jacob sees.  Jacob is even a little
       unstuck in time as images from the past flood on him as if they are the
       present.

            This is an unpleasant and uncomfortable horror film to sit through,
       be warned.  It improves a great deal on thinking about it afterward.
       Just as is true with many of the individual scenes of this film, so too
       when the entire film is over we are tantalizingly unsure of exactly what
       we have seen and how it is to be interpreted.  Adrian Lyne, who directed
       _F_l_a_s_h_d_a_n_c_e, _F_a_t_a_l _A_t_t_r_a_c_t_i_o_n, and _9-1/2 _W_e_e_k_s, photographed this film in
       murky, muted colors, much as _F_l_a_t_l_i_n_e_r_s was photographer, but his visual
       style picks out the squalid and the disturbing.  Murky colors are an
       intelligent ploy to get around audience insistence on color photography
       but still have mood effects that one usually can get only with
       monochrome.  I rated this film a low +1 leaving the theater, but it
       improves greatly on reflection and at this point I would rate it a +2 on
       the -4 to +4 scale.   [SPOILER ON NEXT PAGE]









       Jacobs Ladder               November 3, 1990                      Page 2



                            *****HEAVY SPOILER WARNING****
                    *****ONLY FOR THOSE WHO HAVE SEEN THE FILM****

            As early as when Jacob is dropped off at the locked subway station,
       I started thinking this was a re-working of Ambrose Bierce's "Occurence
       at Owl Creek Bridge."  I left the theater assuming that was correct.
       However, that would imply that the entire future is fictional.  But
       Jacob's entire knowledge of The Ladder is from the future.  Yet Jacob
       has already seen the convulsions that are explained only by The Ladder.
       If the convulsions are real, we must interpret The Ladder as real.  If
       The Ladder is real then some of the future is really happening also.
       Suddenly the story is less like the Bierce and much more like _C_a_r_n_v_a_l _o_f
       _S_o_u_l_s, where the soul survives and assumes it is still alive and the
       living take it for a living soul.  The faceless demons could even be a
       direct borrowing of the carnival dead in _C_a_r_n_i_v_a_l _o_f _S_o_u_l_s.  Well, if
       you're going to borrow, borrow from the best.


















































                                 REVERSAL OF FORTUNE
                           A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                            Copyright 1990 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  Famous lawyer Alan Dershowitz
            defends Claus von Bulow in this adaptation of
            Dershowitz's book.  While none of the characters is
            anyone you would really want to know or even deal with,
            some of the re-assessment of what appears initially to be
            an "open and shut" case is reminiscent of _T_w_e_l_v_e _A_n_g_r_y
            _M_e_n.  Rating: high +1 (-4 to +4).

            There is an old exchange where one person says, "The rich are
       different from us."  And the other person responds, "Yes, they have more
       money."  _R_e_v_e_r_s_a_l _o_f _F_o_r_t_u_n_e gives us glimpses into quite a few things
       but one is the lifestyles of the very rich.  What we see is less than
       totally inviting.  In _R_e_v_e_r_s_a_l _o_f _F_o_r_t_u_n_e our first impressions of Claus
       von Bulow play off all our prejudices against the European aristocracy.
       He is cultured, cold, emotionless, and calculating.  He seems a marble
       statue that has been granted the power of speech.  In a sense he is the
       damsel-in-distress of this piece.  As the film begins he has already
       been found guilty of the attempted murder of his wife Sunny.  To avoid
       going to prison he gets trial lawyer and professor of law Alan
       Dershowitz to defend him.  Of course, as a matter of record Dershowitz
       did successfully appeal the conviction and in a retrial had von Bulow
       acquitted of the charges.  _R_e_v_e_r_s_a_l _o_f _F_o_r_t_u_n_e, based on Dershowitz's
       own book, is the story of how Alan Dershowitz defended the impassive
       Claus von Bulow.

            The film also gives us a view into Dershowitz's unorthodox defense
       procedures.  He turns his house into a workshop with teams in each room
       researching the legal ramifications of a different piece of evidence
       against von Bulow.  The teams even have sweatshirts labeled with the
       piece of evidence they are working on.  Dershowitz may be bragging about
       the completeness of his approach but, in fact, one may wonder at the
       fairness of expending this magnitude of resource in a legal action.
       Dershowitz moralizes why he should take the case even if von Bulow is so
       likely guilty, but the audience never works up the respect for him and
       his methods that it has for the dramatized Clarence Darrow in _I_n_h_e_r_i_t
       _t_h_e _W_i_n_d or the dramatized Louis Nizer in _A _C_a_s_e _o_f _L_i_b_e_l.  His causes
       are not so noble and his fees are higher.  As unflattering as this film
       was to Claus, whose only moments of humanity seem to be when he is
       having fun with his own ghoulish image in the press, _R_e_v_e_r_s_a_l _o_f _F_o_r_t_u_n_e
       is far less flattering to Sunny.  This daughter of the idle rich is
       shown to have been mostly dead already by his own actions.  She is
       totally idle and self-indulgent.  Her hours out of bed, which number
       only six a day, are a constant struggle to pass through he system every
       drug she can lay her shaking hands on.  Regardless of anything Claus
       did, we are led to believe that death or near-death was the expected and











       Reversal of Fortune         November 4, 1990                      Page 2



       logical result of an incredibly self-destructive lifestyle.  If she was
       really as portrayed, one wonders how she survived as long as she did.

            In addition to Dershowitz's moralizing, there is one more piece of
       moralizing that is irritating in the film.  The film pokes fun at von
       Bulow's patronizing, if well-intentioned, attitude toward Dershowitz
       being Jewish.  Yet several times the camera takes opportunities to
       remind us that Dershowitz is not just a lawyer, he is a _J_e_w_i_s_h lawyer.
       Camera angles are chosen to show a painting on a Jewish theme in
       Dershowitz's office or to show a menorah in his home.  The camera is
       just as hung up on religion as is von Bulow.

            Of the three stars, Glenn Close as Sunny von Bulow has top billing
       and got the least screen time.  She does, however, narrate the story in
       spite of the fact that it makes little sense to have a narrator who is
       speaking from a coma and who was less than a clear thinker even before
       her coma.  Some attention has been paid to Jeremy Irons's performance as
       Claus, though I have always thought it is easier to be convincingly
       weird than to be convincingly normal.

            On the whole, _R_e_v_e_r_s_a_l _o_f _F_o_r_t_u_n_e panders a bit too much to the
       fans of crime "docudramas."  But it is told with wit and subtlety.  I
       would give it a high +1 on the -4 to +4 scale.