@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 05/08/92 -- Vol. 10, No. 45


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are on Wednesdays at noon.
            LZ meetings are in LZ 2R-158.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       05/13  LZ: ONLY BEGOTTEN DAUGHTER by James Morrow (Books we heard are
                       very good)
       06/03  HO: THRICE UPON A TIME by James Hogan (Time Travel) (HO 1N-310)
       06/24  LZ: RAFT by Stephen Baxter (Gravity)
       07/15  LZ: THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO SCIENCE FICTION by David Pringle (SF
                       reference books)
       08/05  LZ: THE SILMARILLION by J.R.R. Tolkien (Alternate Mythologies)

         _D_A_T_E                    _E_X_T_E_R_N_A_L _M_E_E_T_I_N_G_S/_C_O_N_V_E_N_T_I_O_N_S/_E_T_C.
       05/09  SFABC: Science Fiction Association of Bergen County: TBA
                       (phone 201-933-2724 for details) (Saturday)
       05/16  NJSFS: New Jersey Science Fiction Society: TBA
                       (phone 201-432-5965 for details) (Saturday)

       HO Chair:     John Jetzt        HO 1E-525  908-834-1563 hocpb!jetzt
       LZ Chair:     Rob Mitchell      HO 1D-505A 908-834-1267 mtuxo!jrrt
       MT Chair:     Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzy!leeper
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer        HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 homxc!11366ns
       LZ Librarian: Lance Larsen      LZ 3L-312  908-576-3346 mtfme!lfl
       MT Librarian: Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzy!leeper
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper     MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 mtgzy!ecl
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. Lance Larsen sends us this description  for  the  next  Lincroft
       discussion  book (and thanks to Lance for being the first in a long
       time to actually write a description!):

       ONLY BEGOTTEN DAUGHTER by James Morrow: This book  is  blasphemous.
       This  book  is  profoundly  religious.   A  contradiction?   On the
       surface, yes.  But not really.  The questions "Why  are  we  here?"
       and "What are we supposed to do?" have haunted humanity for as long
       as we have been able to ask  questions.   Many  writers--novelists,
       philosophers  and  theologians--have examined these questions.  For
       most of us, be we proles or people of destiny, these questions  are











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       just  as  difficult  to answer as they are to ignore.  But, can you
       imagine what these questions would be like if you were  God's  ONLY
       BEGOTTEN DAUGHTER?  James Morrow can.

       If America were to become  a  fundamentalist  Christian  theocracy,
       James  Morrow  would  be  its  Salman  Rushdie.   Not because he is
       vandalizing the sacred, but because  he  is  asking  questions  and
       examining the implications of both the questions and their answers.
       I suspect that James Morrow is a Jesuit at heart. [-lfl]

       2. [I haven't written fiction for a good long while, but this story
       came  to  mind  inspired by an incident at this year's Boskone that
       only I noticed.]



       If there is one thing I could tell from the start, it was that this
       guy  had  done something.  He invited Pete, William and me into his
       rooms.  It was one of those old buildings on  El  Dorado.   God,  I
       hate  those buildings.  They all look like a strong wind would blow
       them over.  They're gray and dark inside.  At two  in  the  morning
       they  are  all  the  worse.  The only light in the hallway had been
       coming under his door.

       "Sorry to bother you so late, Mr. ... Wilson?" Pete asked.

       "Yes, Bill Wilson."  His eyes flew from Pete to Willie.   "What  is
       it, Officer?"

       "Mrs. Lee upstairs she said she heard a shout."

       "Uh, that may have been me.  Yes, it was me.  I had a nightmare.  I
       fancy she can even hear me breathing, eating, ...."

       Pete cut him off.  "You live here by yourself?"

       "Yes.  Well, no.  Well, you see, my father-in-law  lives  with  me.
       Well, at least temporarily.  But he's not here now."

       "You and your father-in-law?  No wife?"

       "Lenore died four months ago."  He was  fidgeting  and  the  boards
       were  creaking  beneath  his  feet.  "Her father had lived with us.
       He'd lived with Lenore before we were married and he came  to  live
       with  us.   Such  a  nice  old gentleman."  He seemed to be looking
       around the room again.  I could just  see  a  few  beads  of  sweat
       forming  on  his  forehead.   "His  eyesight  was failing, you see.
       Blind in one eye.  Yes, one eye.  But it still  seems  to  look  at
       you.   It  is  all  milky  white,  but  it  stares like a beam in a
       lighthouse.  Like a beacon."  His eyes kept jumping from the  floor
       to  Willie  to  me  to  the  floor to Pete.  The veins on his hands











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 3



       pulsated as he held the arms of his chair.  "But he isn't here now.
       He's away.  He has business.  Business."

       He smiled at me.  I tried not to react.  If you just wait  some  of
       these guys will break themselves.

       "Business?" Pete asked.  "What kind of business is he in?"

       "Oh, uh, investments.  I guess I don't  really  know.   He  doesn't
       tell me a lot."

       "And he still can travel with his failing eyesight?"  The gaslights
       distorted Wilson's shadow on the wall.

       "He has part... partners.  They take care of him when he travels."

       "Oh, I see," said Pete.  Wilson  turned  that  faltering  smile  on
       Pete, but Pete did not react.  He had an answer for every question,
       but he stammered more and  more  and  stared  at  the  floor.   The
       minutes  passed  slowly  as  Pete  asked  question  after question.
       Finally Wilson just stared wide-eyed at the floor.  Then he was  up
       on  his  feet.  His answers became more and more elaborate.  Pete's
       questioning seemed to touch a nerve.   Wilson  began  lapsing  into
       incoherence.   His  words made no sense at all.  Then with a shriek
       he said, "Villains, dissemble no more!  I admit the deed!--Tear  up
       the planks!re, here! is the beating of his hideous heart!"

       Well, that was it then.  We picked up the floorboards and found the
       old  man's  body.   It  probably wasn't there more than a couple of
       hours.  Pete said, "Well, one of us should probably go up and  tell
       Mrs. Lee  she  was right.  Can't blame Wilson for going crazy.  The
       sound of her damn rocking chair was driving me crazy too."


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                           ...mtgzy!leeper



            The question of whether a computer can think is no more
            interesting than the question of whether a submarine can
            swim.
                                          -- Edsger W. Dijkstra 






















                              FOURTH ANIMATION CELEBRATION
                            A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                             Copyright 1992 Mark R. Leeper



               It is time again for Expanded Entertainment to send touring
          around major cities their annual animation celebration.  These used
          to be better than they are now.  In large part that is because what
          used to go into just the Tournee of Animation is now spread over the
          annual Tournee, the celebration, and into competing festivals such
          as the British Animation Explosion.  There just isn't enough
          innovative animation for four new animation anthologies a year.
          This year's animation was almost entirely traditional flat
          animation.

               Notably missing was clay animation.  Also missing was any entry
          from Pixar with their simulated 3-D animation.  (Hey, Craig, if you
          are reading this, when is Pixar going to get more into story-
          telling?  Is computer animation cost-effective for the sort of
          story-telling Will Vinton does?  I think it is probably pretty tough
          to create likable characters with computer animation, at least for
          now.)  Also fewer were the number of pieces with an
          ecology/conservation theme.  (This may not be such a bad time to
          re-evaluate conservation, actually.  Fact: carbon dioxide is
          building in the atmosphere _s_l_o_w_e_r than we expected.  Interpretation:
          each year nature is becoming more, not less, efficient at converting
          CO-2 to oxygen.  Apparent conclusion: in spite of massive losses at
          the Amazon, worldwide vegetable biomass is on the increase.
          Hindsight explanation: excesses of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in
          the atmosphere are healthy for plant life.  If there is an excess,
          plant life can adjust to take up the slack.  This is not confirmed
          as yet, but there does appear to be more to it than just wishful
          thinking.  Source: Morning Edition, National Public Radio.)

               I generally rate the pieces excellent (E), very good (VG), good
          (G), fair (F), and poor (P).  I thought this year there were neither
          poor films not excellent ones; there was only one fair.

             - "Madcap" (Phil Denslow; USA; 2:05): Apparently meaningless
               gyrating spots and lines are interspersed with title cards
               containing increasingly weird disclaimers.  (G)

             - "Canfilm" (Zlatin Radev; Bulgaria; 18:11): The best (and
               longest) piece of the fest.  It took me a little while to
               figure out what the analogies were in this allegory.  We see a
               country whose citizens are food cans.  As we open, the proper
               contents to have are cherries.  Then a new regime comes along
               that wants all the cans to hold tomatoes.  Secret police cans
               carry off cans of cherries to teach them proper contents.  Some
               very nice ideas.  (VG)











          4th Animation Celebr.       May 5, 1992                       Page 2



             - "Dancing" (Bruno Bozzetto; Italy; 2:41): Bozzetto had at the
               1991 _F_e_s_t_i_v_a_l _o_f _A_n_i_m_a_t_i_o_n a very nice piece on the history of
               warfare ("Grasshoppers").  This piece is unfortunately a good
               deal more cryptic.  It is an image of a man dancing on a rock
               and visited by Death.  (G)

             - "The Song of Wolfgang the Intrepid, Destroyer of Dragons"
               (Mikhail Tumelya; USA?; ?:??): Wolfgang sets off to slay a very
               large but sleeping dragon.  Light and fun.  (This and the next
               two items were not listed in the program, so the country and
               running times are unknown.)  (G)

             - "A Smaller World" (Corky Quakenbush; USA?; ?:??): A satire on
               soap operas told with dolls facing life.  A doll couple
               ordering a baby doll from a catalogue discovers it is bigger
               than either of them.  Not as funny as it sounds.  (G)

             - "Buttons" (?; USSR?; ?:??): This piece (as well as the previous
               two) was not in the program.  Nevertheless, it is one of the
               better pieces.  A wealthy official goes through his day
               oblivious to the fact that every time he pushes a button--like
               a doorbell or light switch--a bomb detonates somewhere in his
               city. He ignores the destruction he is causing and continues
               his life as normal.  (The title and all the credits were in
               untranslated Cyrillic, so the title is more descriptive than
               accurate.)  (VG)

             - "World Problems" (miscellaneous; miscellaneous; 6:00):
               Sponsored by American and European MTV.  Several international
               animators do small blackout sketches on the subject of world
               problems and their solutions.  Most popular was about a boy,
               uncertain if he should recycle paper, being threatened by a
               militant tree.  (?)

             - "Green Beret" (Stephen Hillenburg; USA; 3:19): A man's house is
               besieged by a different kind of Green Beret: a cookie-selling
               Girl Scout.  Some of the images are quite funny.  (G)

             - "Weeds" (Thomas Stellmach; Germany; 4:22): In a vast plane
               tiled over by stone a snail and some plants survive on the last
               square not yet tiled.  Can the snail survive against man's
               machinery?  (G)

             - "Fantastic Person" (Candy Guard; Great Britain; 3:32): Candy
               Guard's work is so consistent, there is very little need to see
               more than one of her animation pieces.  Her characters are
               disenfranchised English women.  The title character is
               currently out of work, but has great plans for the future.  She
               just cannot work up the motivation to get started.  (G)













          4th Animation Celebr.       May 5, 1992                       Page 3



             - "The Tale of Nippoless Nippleby" (Keith Alcorn, Paul Claerhout,
               John Davis; USA; 4:00): This is a variation of the "Ugly
               Duckling."  It is a bit off-color and droll, but it makes its
               point.  (VG)

             - "Office Space" (Mike Judge; USA; 1:57): A very short piece
               about the office nerd upset about the way he is treated and
               with dreams of quitting.  (G)

               (Next come three pieces intended as tributes to Tex Avery.)

             - "Unsavory Avery" (John Schnall; USA; 2:19): A wolf-like night
               club singer is obviously considered incredibly sexy by the
               women in the audience.  However, he is not the good catch he
               appears.  While some of the visual gags are borrowed from the
               Avery cartoons, the art is considerably simpler.  I would say
               the story is not as good as an Avery story either.  (G)

             - "RRRINGG!" (Paul de Nooijer; The Netherlands; 2:50): Even
               further from Avery's style, posed with live-action figures
               (like people) rather than with sketches.  I am not really a fan
               of de Nooijer's animation from previous fests.  Again, there
               are some visual gags borrowed from Avery.  (G)

             - "Pre-Hysterical Daze" (Gavrilo Gnatovich; USA; 7:23): The best
               of the three Avery tributes is a caveman being chased by
               dinosaurs (after a disclaimer saying that the two were not
               contemporary).  There is some fun with the medium.  (VG)

             - "The Boss" (Alison Snowden, David Fine; UK; 1:32): Ninety-two
               seconds done by IBM show there are creative ways to solve a
               problem.  This is just a little piece about how someone who
               liked his job but not his boss got out of his dilemma.  Perhaps
               the fellow the "Office Space" should see this one.  (G)

             - "The Hunter" (Mikhail Aldashin; USSR; 4:18): Entertaining but
               not very engaging story of a primitive hunter going after big
               game.  Various absurd ploys of camouflage are used.  (G)

             - "Quinoscopio" (Juan Padron/Quino; Cuba; 4:40): This is a Cuban
               film with a series of blackout-style jokes.  None are really
               hilarious, but many are reasonably witty.  (VG)

               Overall, this was a very mediocre film festival.  If the
          British Animation Explosion comes your way, that is still the most
          recommended Festival of Animation in recent memory.




















                          SHELTERED LIVES by Charles Oberndorf
                    Bantam Spectra, 1992, ISBN 0-553-29248-X, $4.99.
                           A book review by Evelyn C. Leeper
                            Copyright 1992 Evelyn C. Leeper



               This is a story about AIDS.

               Oh, it's not called AIDS, but its victims are called "hivers,"
          a clear reference to the HIV virus, and it is transmitted the same
          way as the HIV virus, and the results are the same.  And the victims
          are being sent to quarantine camps, a "solution" that has been
          proposed for AIDS victims.  (Please, no PC objections--if we can
          have cancer victims and heart attack victims and stroke victims and
          flu victims, we can have AIDS victims.)

               Unfortunately for the suspension of my disbelief, the societal
          structure seems to have gone off in a direction quite different than
          that the quarantine camps would imply.  There is some neo-Puritan
          backlash, but there is also legalized prostitution beyond anything
          we have today:  "companions" available by the hour, the day, or even
          longer.  Even with instant-result blood tests, I'm not sure I find
          this convincing.  Michael Kube-McDowell's _Q_u_i_e_t _P_o_o_l_s, with its
          extended marriages giving people multiple partners within a limited,
          presumably "safe" population, seems more likely.  Oberndof also
          supposes that same-sex marriages will become legal in most states
          and relatively common.  (Consider how long it took for inter-racial
          marriages to become legal, and how much longer it took for them to
          become even as common as they are today.  This novel takes place
          considerably less than that in the future.)  Oh, and in this future
          would there are monitor cameras everywhere and just about everyone
          seems to think they're a great idea.  All this seems just a bit
          contrived to me.

               Oberndorf tries hard, and writes well, but the whole plot is
          too predictable and mechanical.  Rod Lawrence, professional
          companion, is hired for a long-term contract by Anna Baxter.
          Baxter's father's company built the quarantine camps, but Baxter is
          involved with groups opposing them.  Lawrence is under pressure from
          the government to spy on Baxter, from opposition groups to spy on
          the authorities, and from his family to give up his sinful life.

               But perhaps most irritating is Oberndorf's reluctance to let
          the work speak for itself.  Instead he interjects long philosophical
          discussions between characters about the morality of the monitors,
          the camps, and all the other changes, and closes with a long
          dialogue between Lawrence and the senior Baxter in which Lawrence
          asks,"It's one hundred years into the future.  There has been a cure
          for ... all disease transmitted sexually.  People have discovered
          how to live sexually free lives without jealousy or guilt.  ...  A











          Sheltered Lives             May 4, 1992                       Page 2



          historian from that period ... looks at Baxter Construction.  He
          looks at the camps your company built....  He doesn't believe the
          inmates did anything wrong.  How will that historian portray you?"
          By presenting this rather unlikely hypothesis as practically a _f_a_i_t
          _a_c_c_o_m_p_l_i (let's face it, we haven't figure out how to live sexually
          free lives without jealousy or guilt for the past several years, and
          disease was only a minor contributing factor, so why will the next
          hundred years do the trick?), Oberndorf apparently hopes to get the
          reader to agree with his message, but all it did to me was to annoy
          me at the lack of subtlety.  (One could of course also hypothesize a
          hundred years in the future historians saying that the camps were
          the only thing that saved humanity from being wiped out.  One can
          hypothesize anything, and make it sound logical.  The trick is to
          predict what will happen, not hypothesize what might.)

               There will undoubtedly be many books whose roots are in the
          AIDS plague; one can only hope that some of these will use their
          material better.
















































                        MY TOP TEN FILMS OF 1991
                    A film article by Mark R. Leeper
                     Copyright 1991 Mark R. Leeper



       This was supposedly a very bad year at the box office.  I guess
  I find that strange, since on the whole I thought we had more good
  films this year than in most previous years.  I don't usually rate
  five films as +3 (or low +3) in a single year.  And the idea that a
  Sylvester Stallone film would make my top ten list would have been
  unbelievable at the beginning of the year.

    1.  CYRANO DE BERGERAC:  For those unafraid of subtitled films,
        there is a lot to like in the new film production of CYRANO DE
        BERGERAC.  The play is excellent and this is perhaps the best
        production of the play ever done.  Rating: +3.  [Technically a
        1990 film, this never got a wide release until 1991.]

    2.  BARTON FINK:  Very strange but supremely well-crafted film
        from Joel and Ethan Coen.  The Coen Brothers have the best
        batting average in Hollywood.  They have made four films and
        each of the four is highly recommended.  During a bout of
        writer's block (which they obviously got over) writing
        MILLER'S CROSSING they wrote this strange film about a young
        playwright facing the same problem in Hollywood.  Great
        performances, great photography, weird film!  Rating: +3.

    3.  HOMICIDE:  Strange and disturbing thriller about a Jewish
        policeman torn between two cases.  David Mamet's best film so
        far is one of those films you cannot fairly even give thought
        to until it is all over.  This is one of those films you may
        spend more time thinking about than you will have spent
        watching it.  Rating: +3.

    4.  IRON AND SILK:  Mark Salzman stars in the film based on his
        autobiographical book about his two years teaching in China in
        the early 1980s.  While the film places too strong an emphasis
        on his martial arts training, it is a valuable film to help
        understand what is happening in modern-day China.  Rating: low
        +3.

    5.  PROSPERO'S BOOKS:  Peter Greenaway's Christmas package for
        really jaded fans of fantasy or Shakespeare.  This film breaks
        a lot of rules, but it is still a marvelous and fascinating
        retelling of THE TEMPEST in visionary terms.  It may be one of
        the great fantasy films for just the right audience.  Rating:
        low +3.

    6.  SILENCE OF THE LAMBS:  A dark and fascinating thriller that is
        a genuine departure in the depiction of the psychopathic











  Top Ten of 1991           April 30, 1991                      Page 2



        killer on the screen.  Hannibal Lecter is a screen villain as
        memorable as Norman Bates.  Rating: high +2.

    7.  THE ROCKETEER:  The 1981 graphic novel comes to the screen as
        what may be the best film ever made based on a comic book.
        This is a wonderful tying together of odd historical detail in
        the story of a man who becomes a super-hero with the help of a
        rocket pack.  Rating: high +2.

    8.  BEAUTY AND THE BEAST:  Disney's animated feature films are, in
        my opinion, over-rated.  They lack plot and complexity.  Their
        emotional impact is limited.  The usual excuse is that they
        are only supposed to be simple children's films.  BEAUTY AND
        THE BEAST demonstrates that a lot more can be done in this
        medium.  It beats BAMBI, CINDERELLA, SNOW WHITE, SLEEPING
        BEAUTY, and all of the other classics, including FANTASIA.
        Parents should go with their kids.  If you don't have kids, go
        anyway.  This one may not be on cassette this century.
        Rating: +2.

    9.  OSCAR:  A delightful surprise.  OSCAR is a throwback to manic
        screwball comedies of the 1930s that takes chances and them
        makes them work.  Undemanding as a star vehicle for Sly
        Stallone, OSCAR is packed with eccentric weirdos, funny hoods,
        and lots of nutty dialogue.  It has been a good long time
        since I laughed so much at a comedy.  Rating: +2.

   10.  OBJECT OF BEAUTY:  A well-crafted comedy with some nice
        dramatic moments and some serious things to say.  This story
        is of the theft of a valuable piece of art from a spendthrift
        American couple living in London.  The story touches a broad
        range of emotions with some of the minor characters more
        interesting than the main ones.  Rating: +2.