@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 08/21/92 -- Vol. 11, No. 8


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are on Wednesdays at noon.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       08/26  HO: BONE DANCE by Emma Bull (Hugo nominee) (HO 1N-410)
       09/16  HO: THE SILMARILLION by J.R.R. Tolkien (Alternate Mythologies)
                       (HO 4N-509)

         _D_A_T_E                    _E_X_T_E_R_N_A_L _M_E_E_T_I_N_G_S/_C_O_N_V_E_N_T_I_O_N_S/_E_T_C.
       08/15  NJSFS: New Jersey Science Fiction Society: TBA
                       (phone 201-432-5965 for details) (Saturday)
       09/12  SFABC: Science Fiction Association of Bergen County: Michael
                       Kandel (author) (phone 201-933-2724 for details)
                       (Saturday)

       HO Chair:     John Jetzt        HO 1E-525  908-834-1563 hocpb!jetzt
       LZ Chair:     Rob Mitchell      HO 1D-505A 908-834-1267 hocpb!jrrt
       MT Chair:     Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzy!leeper
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer        HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 homxc!11366ns
       LZ Librarian: Lance Larsen      LZ 3L-312  908-576-3346 mtfme!lfl
       MT Librarian: Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzy!leeper
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper     MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 mtgzy!ecl
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. The next book for discussion in Holmdel (on August 26)  is  Emma
       Bull's _B_o_n_e _D_a_n_c_e, about which Evelyn Leeper says:

       What can I say about _B_o_n_e _D_a_n_c_e?  Well, it's in the minority  among
       Hugo-nominated  novels this year in that it is _n_o_t part of a series
       for which a previous entry has won the Hugo.  I realize that  isn't
       exactly  a  stirring  recommendation, but at least it means that it
       was nominated on its own merits, not because it was something  that
       readers  felt  "comfortable" with.  Set in a sort of post-holocaust
       punk  world,  it  is  populated  with  characters  who  survive  by
       scavenging the remains of our civilization.  The holocaust was "not
       a bang, but a whimper," so the remains that  are  valuable  include
       classic  videotapes  and other technological doo-dads that would be
       worthless after the usual sort of  holocaust  science  fiction  has
       dealt  with.   This  sort  of in-between situation is becoming more











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       popular as a milieu these days, but Bull does it better than  most.
       [-ecl]

       2. Anyone in Middletown who wants to carpool  to  Holmdel  for  the
       discussion, please contact Evelyn Leeper (x7-2070, mtgzy!ecl).

       3. A few issues back I was writing about my Presidential  campaign.
       I  am now calling my party the None-of-the-above party.  So anyway,
       I am about ready to announce a second platform for  all  you  None-
       of-the-abovists  out  there.   This  has come after a great deal of
       conferring with my advisors.

       Oh, does it surprise you that I have advisors?   Yes,  it  is  more
       than  just  Evelyn.   I actually have a large staff of advisors out
       there to tell me about world events.  They report to me on the hour
       and on the half-hour.  I don't listen to them that often, but I try
       to give them my ear every day or so.  Turns out they are  the  same
       advisors  Saddam  Hussein  had  and they helped him win a (somewhat
       belatedly announced) victory over some of the  strongest  countries
       in the world.

       I say belatedly announced, because word of how we  screwed  up  the
       Persian  Gulf  War  had  to  wait  until  there  was a Presidential
       campaign going on.  And that brings me  to  my  announcement  of  a
       plank  in my platform.  Most people will tell you that Presidential
       campaigns go on much too long in our country and it is much  better
       in  places  like Britain, where campaigns for the reins of power go
       on for only about a month.  Well, that us what the politicians want
       you  to  believe.   Not  me,  though.   The None-of-the-Above party
       recognizes that it  is  only  during  Presidential  campaigns  that
       anything  gets  done.   It is only during campaigns that you get an
       inkling of what is going on.

       You think it was just a coincidence that  it  was  not  until  this
       season:

          - that you had a world-wide environmental conference  that  made
            each country state where it stood?
          - that new evidence in Irangate (out of the  papers  for  years)
            has come to light?
          - that we find out that there were American  MIAs  held  in  the
            Soviet Union?
          - that somebody asked Dan Quayle to spell "potato"?
          - that there are witnesses who claim that they saw  George  Bush
            in  Paris,  presumably  negotiating  the  delay  of  the  Iran
            hostages?
          - that American POWs from the Korean War were taken to China?
          - that the Pentagon now admits  that  films  it  showed  to  the
            public and said were the destruction of SCUD sites were really
            only showing tanker trucks being bombed?
          - that in the shooting down of the Iranian airbus, the ship  was











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 3



            spying in Iranian territorial waters, expected to be attacked,
            and interpreted the airbus as such an attack in spite  of  the
            fact it was ascending rather than descending?

       All this good stuff waited until  a  Presidential  campaign.   (You
       want  to  know  how  dependable  it  is?  As I started writing this
       article I turned on CNN and got a new example, the China/Korean War
       POW story broke as I was writing.)  Do you really think nobody knew
       till now that we had the kind of Vice-President who couldn't  spell
       "potato."

       If elected, I  promise  to  work  with  Congress  to  lengthen  the
       campaigns  and  shorten  the  term of the Presidency so that we can
       always have the benefits of a  current  Presidential  campaign.   I
       promise  that  within  thirty days of my becoming President, people
       will already be campaigning against me.


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                           ...mtgzy!leeper



            A respect for the will of the majority is more harmful
            than respect for the will of God, because the will of
            the majority can be ascertained.
                                          -- Bertrand Russell






































                THE LOST ADVENTURES OF SHERLOCK HOLMES by Ken Greenwald
                    Mallard Press, ISBN 0-792-45107-4, 1989, $9.98.
                           A book review by Evelyn C. Leeper
                            Copyright 1992 Evelyn C. Leeper



               This book came in and went out of print so fast that if you
          blinked you missed it.  I did, and ended up having to pay more than
          cover price for it (at Whodunit? in Philadelphia which still had two
          or three more copies).  It comprises thirteen short stories based on
          the original radio plays starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce
          from the 1945-1946 season.  The plays themselves are available on
          cassette as "The New Adventures of Sherlock Holmes," which includes
          not only these stories but several more from the series as well.

               The stories themselves are rather pale imitations of Doyle.  As
          radio plays they engage the listener's attention, but transcribed to
          paper they seem rather thin.  Some are based on incidents briefly
          mentioned in the Canon (e.g., "The Adventure of the Notorious Canary
          Trainer").  And one of them even includes the daughter of Irene
          Adler--I'm beginning to hate _t_h_e woman (here rendered as "THE
          WOMAN," making it sound as though Holmes is screaming every time he
          says it!).

               All in all, _T_h_e _L_o_s_t _A_d_v_e_n_t_u_r_e_s _o_f _S_h_e_r_l_o_c_k _H_o_l_m_e_s is probably
          of only minor interest and I can't recommend spending a lot of time
          looking for it or money if you find it.


          %B      Lost Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
          %A      Ken Greenwald
          %C      ?
          %D      1989
          %I      Mallard Press
          %O      hardback, US$9.98
          %G      ISBN 0-792-45107-4
          %P      203pp




























                             BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER
                         A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                          Copyright 1992 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  The title is cute and some of
            the Valley Girl gags really are funny.  But the
            horror elements are poorly handled and seem to have
            been chosen from other films for restaging.  This one
            is cable fare.  Rating: -1 (-4 to +4).

            The one original vampire hunter and the best known was, of
       course, Van Helsing from Bram Stoker's _D_r_a_c_u_l_a.  Universal had the
       character in two films in the 1930s.  Hammer had at least some
       character named Van Helsing (always played by Peter Cushing) in four
       different films.  It created the idea that the Van Helsing family
       took it as a congenital mission to destroy vampires.  _B_u_f_f_y _t_h_e
       _V_a_m_p_i_r_e _S_l_a_y_e_r modifies this idea to say that there are a chain of
       women vampire hunters going back to the Middle Ages.  It asks what
       would happen if the mantle fell on the shoulders of a Valley Girl
       who is less than totally bright (to put it charitably).  Well,
       perhaps the idea has possibilities.  We may never know.  What we
       have gotten is a film that bears the earmarks of having been made
       from the first draft of a script, then edited by someone who was not
       interested in the material.

            Buffy seems to be majoring in sensual cheerleading at Hemery
       High School in the San Fernando Valley.  In the opening sequences we
       establish that she is very now and awesome and, in her own words,
       "vacuous."  Then a mysterious character named Merrick arrives on the
       scene and tells Buffy that she is next in line to be a vampire
       slayer.  Why does he think it is she?  Why did this honor come to be
       conveyed on her?  Why ask why?  The screenwriter didn't.  Though
       Buffy is skeptical at first, when bodies start digging their way out
       of graves, she starts to reconsider.

            So far the plot isn't so bad.  We could stand to have a little
       more explanation for what is going on, but this film could still be
       decent.  Then _B_u_f_f_y sours very quickly.  At least the horror aspects
       of the plot do.  We get a few scenes of vampires reprised from other
       films as if borrowing their scenes also borrows their logic.  There
       are scenes of the main vampire (played by Rutger Hauer made up to
       look like Edgar Allan Poe) catered to by his assistant (played by
       Paul Reubens)--the sort of thing you saw in the later and poorer
       Hammer films with Mike Raven.  But why is this aristocratic vampire
       showing up in Southern California, so near to where this
       generation's slayer is being created?  Is it coincidence?  Is there
       a reason?  We never know.  It is convenient for the story that he be
       there, so he is.  And given that vampires have kept their existence
       almost entirely secret all these years, why do they suddenly start











       Buffy the Vampire Slayer  August 14, 1992                     Page 2



       acting as openly and blatantly as Hell's Angels?  Well, the film
       needed a spectacular third act and that logic is more important than
       story logic.  This is a film that never fails to sacrifice its
       intelligence when that becomes convenient.  Prime example: to show
       how dense the teachers are at Hemery High, their reaction to the
       vampire attack is to officiously drop detention slips on each of the
       victims.  It makes no sense but, hey, maybe it will get a laugh.

            The film does work a little better as a satire of the Valley
       Girl lifestyle; perhaps the writers understood that a little better
       than the horror aspects.  But even there, there are problems with
       the basics.  The plot has Buffy becoming friends with the local
       rebel who shaves off his beard for her.  That sounds simple to show
       in film.  But the beard disappears before the shaving scene and then
       returns.  This is a lot more than a marginal continuity error since
       the film does focus on the shaving ritual.  Another problem in
       script muddling is Buffy's satorial realization of what an enigmatic
       statement really means.  The problem is that it is never explained
       to the audience.

            _B_u_f_f_y _t_h_e _V_a_m_p_i_r_e _S_l_a_y_e_r has a little humor that really is
       funny, some that is heavy-handed, and some horror film trappings.
       Unless publicity works overtime, _B_u_f_f_y will quickly zap to its
       appropriate medium, video.  I rate this a -1 on the -4 to +4 scale.










































                                    DIGGSTOWN
                         A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                          Copyright 1992 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  _D_i_g_g_s_t_o_w_n is a fast, smart film
            about a con job worthy of the "Mission Impossible"
            team.  Unfortunately, it leaves holes and unanswered
            questions and has an ending that is just not
            completely satisfying.  It is, however, a good film
            to get the juices flowing.  Rating: +1 (-4 to +4).
            (Following the review will be a spoiler section
            presenting script problems.)

            Gabriel Caine (played by James Woods) is a con man about to be
       paroled and he is not waiting to be released to get into mischief.
       He has a scam in mind that could leave him owning a sizable piece of
       a redneck town.  Diggstown is a town that lives and dies for boxing.
       It is named for a local boxing legend who once took on five men in
       one day.  Now the town is covertly owned by John Gillon (played by
       Bruce Dern) who runs the town like a king.  Caine, with a little
       help from some friends like card sharp and hustler Fitz (played by
       Oliver Platt) and a boxer, "Honey" Roy Palmer (played by Lou
       Gossett, Jr.) is going to put the squeeze on John Gillon in an
       absurd bet that Palmer can take on any ten locals.  Once these two
       men set up an honorable bet, each is going to cheat in any way
       possible to win.

            Steven McKay's screenplay based on Leonard Wise's novel _T_h_e
       _D_i_g_g_s_t_o_w_n _R_a_n_g_e_r_s races and forces the viewer to work hard to keep
       up with everything that is happening in _D_i_g_g_s_t_o_w_n's 97 minutes.
       This dialogue is fast and funny, though the film's best line
       (starting "Just remember") is reportedly an ad lib by Woods clever
       enough that the trailer is built around it.  _D_i_g_g_s_t_o_w_n is directed
       by Michael Ritchie, who at some time decided to concentrate on
       sports films like _S_e_m_i-_T_o_u_g_h, _D_o_w_n_h_i_l_l _R_a_c_e_r, _T_h_e _B_a_d _N_e_w_s _B_e_a_r_s,
       and _W_i_l_d_c_a_t_s.  That may be a pity, since his one really superb film,
       _S_m_i_l_e is about a beauty pageant rather than sports.  Ritchie's
       _D_i_g_g_s_t_o_w_n is not as good as _S_m_i_l_e, but it is diverting.  I give it a
       +1 on the -4 to +4 scale.

            (Spoilers)



















       Diggstown                 August 16, 1992                     Page 2



            There are problems with the screenplay.  One is that Caine is
       entirely too brilliant at knowing what his opponent will do.  He is
       prepared for eventualities that he would have no reason to suspect
       would happen.  Also, for him to choose the right set of the ten
       boxers to involve in his plan requires knowledge that he is unlikely
       to have had.  Finally, the punishment at the end seems surprisingly
       mild when one considers what has happened before.