@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 09/04/92 -- Vol. 11, No. 10


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are on Wednesdays at noon.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       09/16  HO: THE SILMARILLION by J.R.R. Tolkien (Alternate Mythologies)
                       (HO 4N-509)
       10/07  HO: THE FORGE OF GOD and THE ANVIL OF STARS by Greg Bear
                       (The Fermi Paradox) (HO 4N-509)
       10/28  HO: Book Swap (HO 4N-509)
       11/18  HO: DOOMSDAY BOOK by Connie Willis (Plagues) (HO 4N-509)
       12/09  HO: A FIRE ON THE DEEP by Vernor Vinge (HO 4N-509)

         _D_A_T_E                    _E_X_T_E_R_N_A_L _M_E_E_T_I_N_G_S/_C_O_N_V_E_N_T_I_O_N_S/_E_T_C.
       09/12  SFABC: Science Fiction Association of Bergen County: Michael
                       Kandel (author) (phone 201-933-2724 for details)
                       (Saturday)
       09/19  NJSFS: New Jersey Science Fiction Society: TBA
                       (phone 201-432-5965 for details) (Saturday)

       HO Chair:     John Jetzt        HO 1E-525  908-834-1563 hocpb!jetzt
       LZ Chair:     Rob Mitchell      HO 1D-505A 908-834-1267 hocpb!jrrt
       MT Chair:     Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzy!leeper
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer        HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 homxc!11366ns
       LZ Librarian: Lance Larsen      LZ 3L-312  908-576-3346 mtfme!lfl
       MT Librarian: Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzy!leeper
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper     MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 mtgzy!ecl
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. Sorry, you are not an instant winner, but thank you for playing.

       2. I think we have all heard that there currently is  a  crisis  in
       Blood  City.  Yes, the American Red Cross tells us that right now--
       RIGHT NOW--the stockpile of blood is  critically  low.   There  was
       more  than  enough  plasma to meet the need but nobody realized the
       Kaiser was going to attack France, and since then  we  have  had  a
       critical  shortage  at the old blood bank.  In fact, at least three
       times in the 1980s there were rumors that the blood bank was  going
       to fail and investors mobbed it wanting to get their blood back.












       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       I dunno.  I used to really believe in giving blood.  I kind of like
       anything  that  will  make me a pound lighter in half an hour.  But
       they give you these stickers to wear on your shirt  that  say,  "Be
       nice  to me, I gave blood today."  And you know they never work.  I
       got one once, got back to my desk, and discovered they were  taking
       away  my  corporate  AmEx card to save a dollar or so a year.  I am
       having my own damn stickers printed that say, "I gave blood  today.
       If  you  didn't, I get to spit on you."  I think that would be more
       effective anyway.


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                           ...mtgzy!leeper


            What is objectionable, what is dangerous about extremists
            is not that they are extreme, but that they are
            intolerant.  The evil is not what they say about their
            cause, but what they say about their opponents.
                                          -- Robert F. Kennedy













































                       CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS: THE DISCOVERY
                         A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                          Copyright 1992 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  The Salkinds know exactly how
            to market a turkey film to get what profit they can
            from it.  What they did not seem to know is that
            their _C_h_r_i_s_t_o_p_h_e_r _C_o_l_u_m_b_u_s: _T_h_e _D_i_s_c_o_v_e_r_y is not a
            turkey, but a reasonably intelligent and enjoyable
            historical film.  It is not a great film but a
            pleasant surprise.  Rating: high +1 (-4 to +4).

            One never quite knows what to expect from the Salkind brothers.
       Early films one associates with the Salkind name include a ponderous
       adaptation of Kakfa's _T_r_i_a_l and a not very engaging adventure, _T_h_e
       _L_i_g_h_t _a_t _t_h_e _E_n_d _o_f _t_h_e _W_o_r_l_d.  The brothers hit pay dirt and made a
       name for themselves with a terrific double film adaptation of _T_h_e
       _T_h_r_e_e _M_u_s_k_e_t_e_e_r_s.  _S_u_p_e_r_m_a_n was extremely uneven in style and
       quality, but it had its moments and was an audience pleaser.  Its
       sequels and spin-offs went rapidly downhill and their image became
       one of flesh without substance.  Their announcement of a film about
       Santa Claus more than enhanced that opinion.  Substance and Santa
       Claus just do not go together.  And then they announced _C_h_r_i_s_t_o_p_h_e_r
       _C_o_l_u_m_b_u_s and it sounded only marginally better.  A film about
       Captain Cook might be interesting.  the Burton and Speke expedition
       had real dramatic possibilities and the film Bob Rafelson made did
       realize some of them.  But Columbus seems like an elementary school
       hero and too corny to make into a real hero.  This was a film that
       everybody knew would not be good and then on top of that there were
       no screenings for critics.  This is a sure sign that the Salkinds
       expected a poor reception from the critics.  They were wrong.  This
       is certainly the best film the Salkinds have done since _T_h_e _T_h_r_e_e
       _M_u_s_k_e_t_e_e_r_s and, while flawed, is getting a generally positive
       critical reception.

            While the film rarely rises to the point of excitement (odd,
       because it is directed by James Bond director John Glen), the film
       does offer historical spectacle and some adventure.  In the late
       1480's Colon (yes, they get his name right in the film even if not
       in the title) is trying to convince the Portuguese court that the
       great Ocean Sea can be crossed by a mariner, particularly one who
       knows a secret.  The Portuguese have sent explorers who do not know
       Colon's "secret" and they returned in failure.  The theme of the
       secret is very nicely handled, incidentally.  It is a little hard
       for the audience to realize for itself what Colon's secret could be.
       When the secret is actually revealed, it turns out to be something
       non-obvious, something that perhaps a few mariners of Colon's day
       might have known, and something that certainly could have made the
       difference between success and failure.  Of course, Colon (played by











       Christopher Columbus      August 30, 1992                     Page 2



       George Corraface of _T_h_e _M_a_h_a_b_a_r_a_t_a) goes to Spain and in spite of
       his original inclinations asks a laid-back Ferdinand (played by Tom
       Selleck in a bizarre piece of casting) and pretty perky Isabella
       (played by Rachel Ward), looking a decade or two under her 41 years.
       (Is this really the same woman who refused to change her petticoat
       until her husband drove the Moors from Spain?)

            While much of the story is familiar there is a fascination in
       seeing Spain in its most momentous--albeit regrettable--year.  There
       is some reference made to the expulsion of Jews, including a moving
       scene of Jews leaving Spain at the same time Colon is, though there
       is little reference to how much of Colon's crew was Jewish or to the
       belief at the Spanish court that Colon was himself a Jew.  Colon is
       called before Torquemada (played by Marlon Brando in this film) not
       on a question of his religion, but rather Colon's contradiction of
       the teachings of St. Augustine, who said there are no lands before
       the great Ocean Sea and for whom a city was named in Florida.  Colon
       proves himself to be a man who knows his audience and what sort  of
       argument will work.  When he argues his case to the Church he uses
       scripture; when arguing to tough businessmen he uses clever
       analogies and the visual aid of a watermelon and a sharp blade.

            Eventually Colon does get to sea in what by rights should have
       been the most exciting chapter but which is, in fact, the least
       original segment.  Ships at sea looking for land, having to avoid
       sabotage, mutiny, trying to find wind--all are fairly familiar plot
       elements of sea films.  There is even a sequence involving a bet
       that seems very unlikely to have had any basis in fact.  Eventually
       landfall is made--I hope this is not a spoiler.  Then comes a most
       interesting dilemma in filmmaking:  should the film portray Colon as
       a hero or be politically correct and make him a tyrant?  The
       solution is to make Colon a man of his time--a time that called for
       gold, glory, gospel, and slaves as the indicators of success.
       Colon's ambitions are those of a man from the 15th instead of the
       20th Century.

            This is a film of great earnestness with humor only in its
       ironies, including a very interesting comment by Torquemada toward
       the end of the film.  It does generate interest in a very daring
       expedition that most of us take for granted.  In spite of some
       distortion of history, it does give the viewer some unconventional
       insights into the great historical event.  Not great but easily a
       high +1 on the -4 to +4 scale.























                                HONEYMOON IN VEGAS
                         A film review by Mark R. Leeper
                          Copyright 1992 Mark R. Leeper



                 Capsule review:  The writer of _T_h_e _I_n-_L_a_w_s and
            _T_h_e _F_r_e_s_h_m_a_n tells the story of a love triangle of a
            neurotic New York private detective trying to marry
            his girlfriend while a big-time gambler tries to win
            her away.  Much of the story takes place in a Las
            Vegas infested with Elvis lookalikes.  Lots of little
            pieces that only sometimes hang together well.
            Rating: +1 (-4 to +4).

            Andrew Bergman has been around making comedies for a long time,
       but in _H_o_n_e_y_m_o_o_n _i_n _V_e_g_a_s he seems more like a new and talented
       amateur than a seasoned professional.  Bergman wrote and directed _S_o
       _F_i_n_e and _T_h_e _F_r_e_s_h_m_a_n, both of which jabbed at bad taste in American
       popular culture.  With _H_o_n_e_y_m_o_o_n _i_n _V_e_g_a_s he has stopped his little
       jabs and pulled out a meat slicer to go after the cult of Elvis
       worshippers.  Not that his basic plot has anything at all to do with
       Elvis: he uses Elvis just to create a comic background for his real
       story.

            Jack Singer (played by likably goofy Nicholas Cage) has been a
       diffident lover to Betsy (played by Sarah Jessica Parker) due to a
       deathbed promise to his mother (played by Anne Bancroft in cameo)
       that he would never marry.  Finally Betsy overcomes the promise and
       the two head for Las Vegas for a quick marriage.  That is where
       Betsy is seen by tough gambler Tommy Korman (played by James Caan).
       Betsy has a very strong resemblance to the wife Korman lost to skin
       cancer, and Korman decides to snare Betsy for himself.  He lures
       Jack into a high-stakes poker game, takes him to the tune of
       $65,000, and then makes a deal with Jack: Jack's debt will be
       forgiven if Betsy will be Korman's platonic companion for the
       weekend.  Korman wants to use charm and his rather comfortable
       lifestyle to win Betsy.  Meanwhile, Jack is becoming increasingly
       frantic to break up the pair as Korman spirits Betsy off to Maui.

            What does all this have to do with Elvis?  Nothing really.  But
       the background of the story is a Las Vegas having a convention of
       Elvis impersonators.  Bergman constantly comments on the story with
       carefully chosen Elvis songs and shows us an army of gaudy Elvis
       lookalikes, Elvises of many races and sizes.  The film is just two
       Elvises short of pushing the gag too far.

            The usually reserved James Caan and the never reserved Nicholas
       Cage each seem to have a field day chewing up the scenery.  It is
       very rare to see Caan putting this much expression in a role and
       clearly enjoying himself.  Smaller roles go to the always enjoyable











       Honeymoon in Vegas       September 1, 1992                    Page 2



       Pat Morita and Peter Boyle as an unnatural naturalized Hawaiian.

            The photography is surprisingly spotty.  At least two scenes
       appeared totally washed out in the print we saw.  Some scenes of
       natural beauty in Maui and natural beauty (?) in Vegas owe more to
       William Fraker's camerawork.  The cartoon credits were amusing and
       usually made sense.  Overall this is an amiable but unexceptional
       comedy.  I rate it a +1 on the -4 to +4 scale.