@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 11/12/93 -- Vol. 12, No. 20


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are in Holmdel 4N-509
            Wednesdays at noon.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       11/17  BRIAR ROSE by Jane Yolen (Nebula Nominee)
       12/08  STAND ON ZANZIBAR by John Brunner (Classic SF)
       01/05  A MILLION OPEN DOORS by John Barnes (Nebula Nominee)
       01/26  Bookswap
       02/16  Demo of Electronic Hugo and Nebula Anthology (MT)

       Outside events:
       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the second
       Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call 201-933-2724 for
       details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society meets on the third
       Saturday of every month in Belleville; call 201-432-5965 for details.

       HO Chair:     John Jetzt        MT 2G-432  908-957-5087 holly!jetzt
       LZ Chair:     Rob Mitchell      HO 1C-523  908-834-1267 holly!jrrt
       MT Chair:     Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzfs3!leeper
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer        HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 homxc!11366ns
       LZ Librarian: Lance Larsen      HO 2C-318  908-949-4156 quartet!lfl
       MT Librarian: Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 mtgzfs3!leeper
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper     MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 mtgpfs1!ecl
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. In observance of Jewish Heritage Month, the next discussion book
       will  be  _B_r_i_a_r _R_o_s_e by Jane Yolen.  In _B_r_i_a_r _R_o_s_e a woman tries to
       find out  the  secret  of  her  grandmother's  past,  and  why  her
       grandmother  was  so  obsessed  with  the  fairy  tale  Briar  Rose
       (a.k.a. Sleeping Beauty).

       For as long as Rebecca can remember, her grandmother Gemma has told
       Rebecca  and  her  sisters the tale of Briar Rose (which we know as
       Sleeping Beauty).  But more than that, she has told them  that  _s_h_e
       is  Briar Rose.  Now that Gemma has died, Rebecca is driven to find
       out who her grandmother really was and why  she  told  this  story.
       Even  from  the  beginning, Rebecca discovers that much of what she
       believed about her  family  history  isn't  true.   Eventually  her











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       search takes her to Poland and the truth about the dark time of the
       Holocaust.

       Yolen has done a very good job in describing a  Jewish  family  and
       its  history,  but what is worth noting is that she has not ignored
       the other aspects of the Nazi regime during that  period.   One  of
       the  primary sources of information for Rebecca when she travels to
       Poland is a man who was imprisoned for his homosexuality.  And  the
       history  involves  other  groups persecuted as well.  Yolen manages
       this without minimizing anyone's suffering--it is not a contest  of
       what group suffered more, but a look at the people who suffered and
       how they often worked together against the horror.

       Marge Piercy's _H_e, _S_h_e, _a_n_d _I_t told a 16th Century legend, both  in
       its  own  time  and  then as a re-telling in a near-future time, so
       that we could see that what seemed like just an old story was still
       very  relevant  to  the  issues that face us today.  In _B_r_i_a_r _R_o_s_e,
       Yolen takes a fairy tale rather than a legend, but  then  does  the
       same  thing: shows us that it would be a mistake to write it off as
       just another story--shows us that even a fairy tale may  have  much
       underlying truth in what it says.  [-ecl]


       ===================================================================

       2. Well as of this writing, we are back from India  for  less  than
       one  week  (though  it  will  probably  be delayed several weeks in
       publication).  India, of course, has a culture that is really  very
       unlike  just  about  anything you can see in this country.  You can
       get little tastes of what India is like, but a small taste is  very
       often misleading.  When I was about three years old my father had a
       bottle of saccharine on the kitchen table.  He would put  a  tablet
       in  his  coffee  and it would make it sweet, I was told.  My mother
       would occasionally put sugar cubes in coffee for the  same  purpose
       and  I  had eaten those from time to time and liked them so I bided
       my time and when nobody was around I got the bottle of saccharine .
       I  tasted  the dust around the rim and found it tasted sweet.  So I
       took two or three saccharine tablets and prepared to pop them in my
       mouth.   It was nice that I could fit more saccharine tablets in my
       mouth than sugar cubes.  In the next second the three tablets  went
       into  my  mouth.   Blech!   Ptooey!   Out  they came.  Concentrated
       saccharine tastes terrible.  It's bitter.  It tastes just about the
       opposite  of  what  a  small taste is like.  The taste of a foreign
       county may act the same way.  Going to  an  Indian  restaurant  may
       not,  in  fact  does  not, give the feel of India but closer to the
       exact opposite feel.

       But when people ask why I want to go to such weird places I usually
       tell  them  it comes from my reading of _H_u_c_k_l_e_b_e_r_r_y _F_i_n_n.  There is
       an incident in it in which  Jim  finds  out  that  somebody  speaks
       French.   Jim  has  never heard of there being different languages.











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 3



       "If he's human, why don't he talk like a human?"  he  asks.   Well,
       gang,  you  and  I  know  that you don't have to talk English to be
       human.  But what else is there that we assume is true of  everybody
       that  may  not  be?  What about kissing?  That is something I guess
       you sort of think  is  an  instinctive  behavior.   It  is  not  so
       intrinsic  of  humans as you might think.  For example the Japanese
       never heard of the practice of kissing until they came  in  contact
       with  the  West.   So  it isn't so intrinsic to humans as you might
       think.  Another example was our first night in China  our  National
       Guide,  a  very  nice  man  who had never come in contact with many
       non-Chinese people before wanted to say something nice to  his  new
       American  guests.   He  looked  at out tour group, which except for
       about five people were all retirees, and told us "We served  you  a
       vegetarian  meal  because vegetables are very good for old people."
       The way his mind worked was to assume all people, or at least  most
       people,  are  proud to have attained a great age.  I am sure eleven
       years later that the National Guides  in  China  know  better  that
       Westerners  don't  like  to  think  of themselves as old, and it is
       probably a less interesting trip because of it.  One of the  things
       we tell ourselves to give ourselves a warm, fuzzy, friendly feeling
       is that people are all really alike.  Don't  you  believe  it.   It
       would  be a much less interesting world if they were.  The hardware
       may  have  similarities,  but  the  software  is   really,   really
       different.  And that is why I travel.


       ===================================================================

       3. THE NIGHTMARE  BEFORE  CHRISTMAS  (a  film  review  by  Mark  R.
       Leeper):

            Capsule  review:   Tim  Burton  proves   himself   a
            creative  genius  with  a  film deserving of instant
            holiday classic status.  Just about everything comes
            together  and  genuinely  works  in the best holiday
            film since  Alistair  Sim  starred  in  _A  _C_h_r_i_s_t_m_a_s
            _C_a_r_o_l.  Rating: +3 (-4 to +4)

       From the on-again off-again career of Tim Burton comes  a  film  so
       original  and  incredibly creative that it genuinely is unlikely to
       be surpassed as a holiday film for decades.  While Burton  did  not
       actually  direct in this outing (Henry Selick did), Burton produced
       and wrote the story, creating the characters.   And  _T_h_e  _N_i_g_h_t_m_a_r_e
       _B_e_f_o_r_e  _C_h_r_i_s_t_m_a_s  shows  an unmistakable Burton style.  The entire
       film is done in beautiful 3-D animation and is the  culmination  of
       the  poetic  fairy  tale  style  we saw some of (but not enough) in
       _E_d_w_a_r_d _S_c_i_s_s_o_r_h_a_n_d_s crossed with the  tongue-in-cheek  horror-spoof
       style  of  "Frankenweenie"  and  "Vincent."   This film dazzles the
       viewer with so many beautiful images that I found  just  taking  my
       eyes  off  the screen to make notes meant I was missing something I
       wanted to see.  The style  the  film  kept  reminding  me  of  some











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 4



       exceptionally  creative  Czech  films--particularly  those  of Jiri
       Trnka--and wishing more films like that could  be  done  elsewhere.
       Now a visual style every bit as compelling, perhaps more, has found
       its way into an American film.  The fairy tale style that  I  liked
       so much in _E_d_w_a_r_d _S_c_i_s_s_o_r_h_a_n_d_s I attributed to Caroline Thompson, a
       then first-time screenwriter whose talents I claimed were just what
       Burton needed.  I am very pleased that Burton seems to have had the
       same insight.  Thompson wrote _N_i_g_h_t_m_a_r_e's screenplay also and  this
       time  she  and  Burton  have completely fulfilled the promise their
       pairing showed in that film.   The  ten  musical  pieces  here  are
       written  and  scored with the clever style and quality of a Gilbert
       and Sullivan operetta.

       The story takes place in a land where holidays are born.  One  town
       makes  Halloween  each year, another makes Christmas.  The artistic
       genius of Halloweentown is one Jack Skellington, a sort of skeleton
       with  a  globular  head.   But  then everyone in Halloweentown is a
       horror, that is the spirit of  Halloween.   The  town  is  full  of
       werewolves, vampires, bats, spiders, mad scientists, and things for
       which there are no names.  Jack is dissatisfied with Halloween  and
       stumbles  on  Christmastown.   He  is  enchanted and puzzled by the
       idea of Christmas and decides he and his town of horrors can do  it
       all  better.   Halloweentown starts working on putting on a horror-
       tinged Christmas.  If that seems  a  silly  plot,  well  you  don't
       expect  a  holiday film is going to have a Dostoyevsky-level story.
       Just accept the story and watch how well it is told.  Regardless of
       the plot this is a film that you _w_i_l_l find rewarding.  Take it from
       me you may possibly have seen a film  like  this  before  but  only
       rarely, and you have never seen it done so well for 75 minutes.  If
       you thought _T_h_e _W_i_z_a_r_d _o_f _O_z was an impressive children's film,  go
       see  _T_h_e  _N_i_g_h_t_m_a_r_e  _B_e_f_o_r_e  _C_h_r_i_s_t_m_a_s.   Amazingly  to me I give a
       Christmas film a rating of +3 on the -4 to +4 scale.


       ===================================================================

       4. GETTYSBURG (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

            Capsule  review:   This  film  of  military  history
            contains  more  authentic  military history than any
            other film I have ever seen.   The  film  itself  is
            more  than  four  hours  and very little seems to be
            fiction.  Perhaps a little is speculation,  but  the
            highest  proportion  of  time  is reenactment of the
            most important  battle  in  United  States  history.
            Rating: +3 (-4 to +4)

       As usual when I see an historical film, I will  go  home  afterward
       and pick up many historical accounts of the event and pick holes in
       what I have seen on the screen.  I have not yet read Shelby Foote's
       account of the battle of Gettysburg (which is about 120 pages), but











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 5



       I have read several shorter accounts.  What I  have  discovered  is
       that  the  film  contradicts  no account any more than the accounts
       contradict each other.  And that is not  surprising  since  by  all
       accounts writer/director Ronald F. Maxwell, after basing his script
       on a Pulitzer Prize winning novel, _T_h_e  _K_i_l_l_e_r  _A_n_g_e_l_s  by  Michael
       Shaara,  allowed his small army of historical experts to be tyrants
       over the production of the film.  What made it  to  the  screen  is
       what  the  experts  agreed  happened.   What  _S_t_a_r  _W_a_r_s was to the
       special effects film, _G_e_t_t_y_s_b_u_r_g is to the historical film.  Nobody
       who  sees  the  film and later reads account of the battle can come
       away without the feeling of having witnessed the battle already and
       without remembering a flood of images from the film.  As far as how
       well the actors look and dress like people of  the  Civil  War  the
       film  gets  an  A+.  For the degree to which each major actor looks
       like the actual person he is portraying the  grade  is  a  not-too-
       shabby  B+.   (The  opening credits show the original and the actor
       and invite comparison.)  Why not higher?  Well for example  at  the
       time  of his most familiar photographs, Lee had a fuller beard than
       Martin Sheen sports.  That is the sort of variation  you  get.   Of
       course  nobody  mentions  how  full  Lee's beard was at the time of
       Gettysburg so perhaps I am underrating the film.  But if I can find
       no less picayune quibble than the length of a beard in a 254-minute
       historical film, I am not just impressed, I am floored.

       The actors are often familiar, if you can make them out  under  the
       heavy  beards  typical  of  the Civil War period.  (The presence of
       women, incidentally, is limited to a count of two and a  screentime
       of  about  six  seconds.)   But  actors  seem to be chosen more for
       proven acting ability than for marquee value.  The players  include
       Tom  Berenger as Gen. Longstreet, Martin Sheen as Gen. Lee, Stephen
       Lang as Maj. Gen. Pickett, the late Richard Jordan  as  Brig.  Gen.
       Armistead,  Jeff  Daniels  as Col. Chamberlain, Sam Elliot as Brig.
       Gen. Buford, and Kevin Conway (whom I thought had been dead for  at
       least a couple years) as the what I would guess was an interpolated
       character, Sgt. Buster Kilrain.

       Gettysburg was the climax of the Civil War as Midway was the climax
       of  the war in the Pacific.  And I found myself comparing this film
       to the film _M_i_d_w_a_y as I watched it.  _M_i_d_w_a_y is  only  five  minutes
       longer  than half of GETTYSBURG's length, yet for that film a whole
       fictional plot of "human interest"  was  added  about  an  American
       commander's son in love with a Japanese-American woman.  Apparently
       the filmmakers thought that so much history was too  much  for  the
       viewer.  In _G_e_t_t_y_s_b_u_r_g with the exception of a few conversations to
       broaden the characters, and a  rhetorical  speech  added  here  and
       there,  what  we  see  is all documented history and ironically the
       film is more and not less compelling as a result.

       From the point of view of the film five men  were  responsible  for
       the  South  going  from a winning war to a losing war with this one
       battle.  For the North, Buford created the strategy and Chamberlain











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 6



       defended  the  weak flank.  For the South, Jeb Stuart chose to raid
       rather then reconnoiter, Ewell failed  to  attack  at  a  strategic
       moment,  and  Lee's  ego  told  him to fight the battle even on the
       enemy's terms because winning would almost certainly bring the  end
       of  the  war.   Of  these  the  most  screen  time  is  devoted  to
       Chamberlain who, torn with self-doubt, shows himself to nonetheless
       represent both heroism and decency.

       _G_e_t_t_y_s_b_u_r_g was reportedly made as a television mini-series  and  at
       some  point  was  redirected  to the big screen.  It will certainly
       lose much of the impact of its huge cast  when  translated  to  the
       small   screen.   In  incredible  list  of  historical  reenactment
       societies apparently volunteered to act as extras  and  to  reenact
       the  battle.  The men participating in Pickett's charge form a very
       long wall that will not be nearly as impressive when the flanks are
       cut  for television's aspect ratio.  On the other hand, getting the
       film on video will allow the stopping of the film and reading  from
       historical  sources  about  the various actions being depicted.  My
       initial reaction to the film was that it must have cut out a lot of
       what  was  really happening to concentrate only on Buford's defense
       of the high ground the first  day,  Chamberlain's  defense  of  the
       flank  the  second  day,  and  Pickett's charge the third day.  The
       first source I saw that described the battle in any  detail  listed
       three  important  actions  and they were exactly the ones chosen by
       the filmmakers.  This engaging film is almost a textbook about  the
       battle  and  because at the same time it is so enthralling, this is
       one of best and perhaps in some respects  is  the  best  historical
       feature film ever made.  Nothing quite like this has ever been done
       at this length and done this elaborately, so it  is  all  the  more
       impressive.  My rating is +3 on the -4 to +4 scale.


       ===================================================================

       5. FAREWELL MY CONCUBINE (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

            Capsule review:  Suffering  for  one's  art  is  the
            theme  of  this  film from three cooperating Chinese
            countries.  The  story  follows  two  Beijing  Opera
            singers  over  a half century.  They suffer to learn
            their art and then each political  change  in  China
            brings  new  suffering.  This is a film that is well
            made but which has limited capacity to  be  enjoyed.
            Rating: 0 (-4 to +4).

       How much misery can anyone give to their art is the question  asked
       by  _F_a_r_e_w_e_l_l  _M_y _C_o_n_c_u_b_i_n_e.  It is the story of a poor boy, the son
       of a prostitute, who becomes a  popular  opera  star  and  what  is
       required  of  him.   Douzi  is groomed for only one role, the loyal
       concubine of a defeated king who kills herself rather  than  desert
       her  lover  and  master.   Learning any role requires an incredible











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 7



       regimen of  punishing  physical  training  and  potentially  lethal
       beatings  from  the  sadistic  perfectionist schoolmaster.  Douzi's
       training entails an even worse aspect--to better play  a  woman  he
       has  to  offstage  and on renounce his gender entirely and think of
       himself as a woman for the rest of his life.  He is  paired  to  go
       through  life  with  Shitou,  the actor groomed for the role of the
       king.  Once they achieve greatness Douzi's problems are still  only
       beginning.   Shitou  decides  to  take a wife of his own, an act of
       chivalry toward a prostitute.  But the pairing  now  turns  into  a
       triangle.  Douzi is forced to take lovers, but only male ones.

       Just when this lifestyle  looks  like  it  cannot  get  worse,  the
       Japanese invade China.  This brings a new set of hardships, and yet
       another set of hardships come along when  the  Nationalists  regain
       China,  the  Communists  bring  yet another bad turn that only gets
       worse with the Cultural Revolution.  The  film  reminds  one  of  a
       Dickens  story except that things do not get better with time.  The
       overall theme seems to be that when you are a man slotted  for  the
       Beijing Opera to play a woman in a single role for your whole life,
       that life is really a bitch and then you die.

       It is hard to imagine a much more nihilist film.  Every  good  deed
       that  one  of  our  two characters performs results in all the more
       misery for them or others.  If you are Chinese it is quite possible
       that  there  is  a perceivable nobility in all the pain, but--and I
       say this as someone who has seen or heard several Beijing  operas--
       it  is  very  hard  for a Westerner tp appreciate the aesthetics of
       this art form.  Even without that there will  be  some  aspects  of
       story that a Westerner will find hard to understand.

       At 170 minutes _F_a_r_e_w_e_l_l _M_y _C_o_n_c_u_b_i_n_e is a difficult film  to  watch
       particularly with its relentlessly downbeat theme.  There have been
       several films this year with Chinese themes and this one is  harder
       to  recommend  than most.  With my limited understanding of Chinese
       culture I would rate this film a 0 on the -4 to +4 scale.


       ===================================================================

       6. To those of you who saw the  recent  announcement  that  various
       Bell  Labs  locations  in  New  Jersey  would  start  charging  for
       conference rooms, rest assured that (for  now,  anyway)  Bell  Labs
       club activities are exempt, so our meetings will continue.  [-ecl]


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                          leeper@mtgzfs3.att.com



            An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy to be called
            an idea at all.
                                          -- Elbert Hubbard





































               THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT ALMOST BLANK