@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 04/22/94 -- Vol. 12, No. 43


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are in Middletown 1R-400C
            Wednesdays at noon.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       05/11  TBA
       06/01  Hugo-nominated novel TBA
       06/22  Hugo-nominated novel TBA
       07/13  Hugo-nominated novel TBA
       08/03  Hugo-nominated novel TBA (tentative)
       08/24  Hugo-nominated short stories TBA (tentative)

       Outside events:
       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the second
       Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call 201-933-2724 for
       details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society meets on the third
       Saturday of every month in Belleville; call 201-432-5965 for details.

       HO Chair:     John Jetzt        MT 2G-432  908-957-5087 j.j.jetzt@att.com
       LZ Chair:     Rob Mitchell      HO 1C-523  908-834-1267 j.j.jetzt@att.com
       MT Chair:     Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer        HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 n.j.sauer@att.com
       LZ Librarian: Lance Larsen      HO 2C-318  908-949-4156 l.f.larsen@att.com
       MT Librarian: Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper     MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 e.c.leeper@att.com
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. The next meeting topic will be announced  by  next  week  (April
       29).  If the Hugo nominees are announced by then, it will be one of
       the five novels nominated; otherwise we will find something to tide
       us over until our Hugo nominee string.


       ===================================================================

       2. There is an old question of whether life  imitates  art  or  art
       imitates  life.  Actually I think it is clear that both are true to
       some extent.  Art is less and less interested in imitating life  as
       it  become  more  and more abstract.  That could be because we have











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       cameras for really realistic art these days and also because really
       realistic  painting  is a slow and detailed process.  Impressionism
       is really the art of saving yourself a lot of effort  sweating  the
       details  and  having  people impressed by how well you can get away
       with it.

       But it seems true that also life imitates art.  There  is  the  old
       question  of whether we are becoming a violent society because that
       is how we represent ourselves in film.  People look  at  what  they
       see in the big and small screen and try to imitate it in real life.
       This could be some nimnull seeing Beavis  and  Butthead  play  with
       matches and do the same thing himself.  Or it could be Adolf Hitler
       seeing the destruction at the beginning of the film _T_h_i_n_g_s _T_o  _C_o_m_e
       and  saying  he  needs to be able to create the same effect in real
       life.  That is a true story, at  least  if  an  issue  of  Ripley's
       "Believe  It  or Not" is to be believed.  (Hitler also really liked
       the  film  _M_e_t_r_o_p_o_l_i_s  according  to  Fritz  Lang's  biography  and
       according  to  Trivial  Pursuit  his  favorite  film was _K_i_n_g _K_o_n_g.
       Apparently he was a  real  fan  of  fantasy  films,  an  historical
       insight  you rarely see in the history books.  That's just a slight
       digression.)

       So life does imitate art.  But in an odd cessation of the  laws  of
       causality, prehistoric life seems to also imitate contemporary art.
       It used to be  that  paleontologists  laughed  at  dinosaur  movies
       because  the  dinosaurs shown were just too big.  Not only did they
       out-scale any of the fossils that had been found, they were  bigger
       than  any  fossils  that  ever would be found.  After all there are
       theoretical limits to how big you can  have  a  reptile  before  it
       becomes  structurally unsound.  And the dinosaurs in films are just
       too darn big.  And they started telling us how big  a  reptile  can
       get.

       Well naturally, just a short time later they discovered the remains
       of  flying  reptiles  that were impossibly large.  They called them
       Rodans after the monster in a Japanese sci-fi movie.  What we think
       of   a   gentle  sauropods  started  turning  uncooperative.   Both
       seismosaurus and supersaurus, subsequently  discovered,  go  beyond
       the  theoretical  size limits of reptiles.  Now the people who used
       to trumpet loudly about size  limitations  on  dinosaurs  are  just
       quietly waiting to see what else will be discovered.  Mother Nature
       does not like having limitations put on  what  she  can  do.   They
       haven't  found  any  two-hundred-foot-tall  Godzillas (four hundred
       feet feet in the English-language version) and probably never will,
       but nobody is really sure what the limits are anymore.

       The latest is that Spielberg's _J_u_r_a_s_s_i_c _P_a_r_k exaggerated  the  size
       of  velociraptors for artistic effect.  Raptors were nasty but they
       were not as big as they appeared in the film ...  it  was  thought.
       And  his  advisors  complained that Raptors were just not that big.
       Apparently Mother Nature saw the film and said "I  got  to  get  me











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 3



       some  of those."  Before the film even was released fossils twenty-
       foot-long, 1500-pound Raptors were found in Utah.  They called them
       Spielberg's  Raptors  (or Utahraptors for the state where they were
       discovered).  It's not nice to underestimate Mother Nature.


       ===================================================================

       3. MYSTERIUM by Robert Charles Wilson (Bantam Spectra, ISBN  0-553-
       37365-X,  1994,  288pp,  US$11.95)  (a  book  review  by  Evelyn C.
       Leeper):

       I have liked all of Robert Charles  Wilson's  previous  books  (_T_h_e
       _H_i_d_d_e_n  _P_l_a_c_e,  _M_e_m_o_r_y  _W_i_r_e,  _G_y_p_s_i_e_s,  _T_h_e  _D_i_v_i_d_e, _T_h_e _B_r_i_d_g_e _o_f
       _Y_e_a_r_s, and _H_a_r_v_e_s_t),  which  is  even  more  interesting  when  you
       consider  how  widely they vary.  _T_h_e _H_i_d_d_e_n _P_l_a_c_e is a fantasy set
       in a hobo camp during  the  Great  Depression,  _M_e_m_o_r_y  _W_i_r_e  is  a
       science  fiction  story  of  cybernetics  in  21st  Century Brazil,
       _G_y_p_s_i_e_s is about the  military  trying  to  use  children  who  can
       "sidestep"  into other worlds, _T_h_e _D_i_v_i_d_e is about the experimental
       enhancement of intelligence, _T_h_e _B_r_i_d_g_e  _o_f  _Y_e_a_r_s  is  about  time
       travel, and _H_a_r_v_e_s_t is about aliens who come to transform the human
       race into something higher.  If there's a pattern here, I don't see
       it.   (And lest there be any confusion, this book is _n_o_t by the co-
       author of the "Illuminati" books.  That is Robert _A_n_t_o_n Wilson.)

       And now we have _M_y_s_t_e_r_i_u_m, a book  based  on  gnosticism.   I  must
       admit  that  gnosticism in the early Christian church is not one of
       my strong points.  From  a  historical  perspective,  I  know  that
       gnosticism  led  in  part  to  Manichaeism  and the religion of the
       Bogomils, but I am less clear on their doctrines, so I have to take
       _M_y_s_t_e_r_i_u_m  based  on  what  Wilson conveys within it.  (I hope he's
       more accurate on gnosticism than on mathematics--where he refers to
       the  "anthropic  principle  in  the  language  of  set  theory"--or
       physics--where  he  describes  a  thirty-degree  incline  as   "not
       steep.")   Of  course,  one might claim that since one of the basic
       principles of gnosticism is hidden knowledge Wilson doesn't have to
       convey  it  clearly.  After all, in Luke 8:10 it is said, "Unto you
       it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom  of  God:  but  to
       others  in  parables;  that  seeing they might not see, and hearing
       they might not understand," a very gnostic concept.

       The town of Two Rivers, Michigan,  is  happy  when  the  government
       builds  a secret laboratory nearby, disappointed when they discover
       the employees won't be pumping money into the  local  economy,  and
       surprised  when  they  wake  up  one morning to discover that their
       entire town has  been  transported  to  a  world  like  theirs--but
       different.   Their country--whatever it is--seems to be at war with
       New Spain, and the Proctors have arrived to bring  the  town  under
       control.   No one is quite sure what has happened, but Howard Poole
       is sure it has something to do with his uncle, Alan Stern.











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 4



       The three parts of _M_y_s_t_e_r_i_u_m are entitled  "Mysterium,"  "Mysterium
       Tremendae," and "Axis Mundis" (reminiscent of the three sections of
       _A _C_a_n_t_i_c_l_e _f_o_r _L_e_i_b_o_w_i_t_z).  Each begins with a brief  excerpt  from
       Stern's  diary,  heavy  on  the Greek terms but somewhat helpful in
       understanding the religious basis not only of this  new  world  but
       also  of  the book itself.  Because gnosticism is the key to what's
       happened to the town of two rivers.

       I have a couple of minor quibbles.  Given the time of  the  "world-
       split,"  it  seems  unlikely  that  names  such as Boston and Meso-
       America would be use.  (Wilson attempts to explain this  by  having
       Graham  note,  "The movements of people, the evolution of language.
       It's as though history wants to flow in  certain  channels.   Broad
       ethnic  groupings persist, and there are roughly analogous wars, at
       least up until the tenth or eleventh century.  There  are  plagues,
       though they follow different patterns.  The Black Death depopulated
       Europe and Asia no less than five times," but I'm  not  convinced.)
       And  his  science  is  sloppy (see my comments about set theory and
       thirty-degree slopes earlier).  But in spite of these  problems,  I
       found  _M_y_s_t_e_r_i_u_m  to be an engrossing novel.  I may not believe the
       religious underpinnings of it, but then the  same  was  true  of  _A
       _C_a_n_t_i_c_l_e  _f_o_r  _L_e_i_b_o_w_i_t_z  and that didn't stop me from liking that.
       This uses religion slightly differently, of course, but read it for
       yourself to see how.


       ===================================================================

       4. AGYAR by Steven Brust (Tor,  ISBN  0-812-51521-8,  1994,  254pp,
       US$4.99) (a book review by Evelyn C. Leeper):

       I greatly enjoyed Steven Brust's _T_o _r_e_i_g_n _i_n _H_e_l_l, and  have  heard
       good  things  about  his other books.  But I have been unwilling to
       jump into the middle of the Vlad Taltos novels or other  associated
       books,  and  _C_o_w_b_o_y  _F_e_n_g'_s  _S_p_a_c_e  _B_a_r  _a_n_d _G_r_i_l_l_e seemed probably
       atypical of his writing style.  (Of course, that  might  also  have
       been  true  of  _T_o _R_e_i_g_n _i_n _H_e_l_l.)  So I was pleased to see that at
       least there was a non-Taltos Brust book available.

       John Agyar is new in town, and leading a  somewhat  peculiar  life.
       He lives in a haunted mansion, where he converses in a quite normal
       fashion with the ghost of the ex-slave Jim.  (This isn't  Hannibal,
       Missouri;  I  doubt there is an intentional reference here.)  He is
       seeing two women, Jill Quarrier and her roommate Susan Pfahl.   And
       he's  being pursued by a third woman, Laura Kellen whose intentions
       are not exactly friendly.

       Brust manages a style that is modern enough for  the  setting,  yet
       poetic  enough for the feelings and the mystery and the strangeness
       of what is happening.  He  keeps  the  reader  just  slightly  off-
       balance,  delivering  a  surprise  here,  a  twist there, but never











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 5



       enough to overthrow what has come before.   This  is  a  book  that
       slowly unfolds and opens itself, like the roses on the cover.  (And
       my the way, the cover by Jim Burns is an excellent rendering  of  a
       painting  described  in  the book itself (pages 219 to 220), and no
       fair skipping ahead to it!).  Agyar, and the town  of  Lakota,  and
       what  happens  there  all  form something you won't soon forget.  I
       recommend _A_g_y_a_r and I may even brave the Dragaeran series  if  this
       is indicative of Brust's writing.


       ===================================================================

       5. BLACK BIBLE  CHRONICLES:  FROM  GENESIS  TO  THE  PROMISED  LAND
       interpreted  by  P.  K. McCary (African American Family Press, ISBN
       1-56977-0000-X, 1993, 190pp, , US$14.95) (a book review  by  Evelyn
       C. Leeper):

       Perhaps best described as "the Torah for  homeboys,"  this  is  the
       first  of  a series of books translating (or "interpreting," to use
       McCary's term) the _B_i_b_l_e into urban language.  This  volume  covers
       the  five  books of Moses (_G_e_n_e_s_i_s, _E_x_o_d_u_s, _L_e_v_i_t_i_c_u_s, _N_u_m_b_e_r_s, and
       _D_e_u_t_e_r_o_n_o_m_y); a second volume has already been  published  covering
       the  four  gospels (called _R_a_p_p_i_n' _w_i_t_h _J_e_s_u_s).  But as a Jew I was
       understandably more interested in this volume.

       This translation omits large sections of these books,  particularly
       the genealogies (the "begats").  Since the footnotes reference this
       translation back to the chapters in the complete version,  I  don't
       consider  this  a big fault.  More problematic is McCary's somewhat
       loose translation.  The use of the term "church" to  refer  to  the
       Temple  may  not  be  too  unreasonable  (though  it points out the
       Christian focus of  this  translation,  rather  than  a  Judaic  or
       Islamic  one),  but  the  translation of "Sabbath" into "Sunday" in
       several spots is irksome and  deceptive.   And,  for  example,  the
       translation of Leviticus 18:21 as "he can't put her children on the
       altar to be burned 'cuz that'll cause the ultimate  in  punishment"
       may  not  be  an  accurate rendering of what the original says: the
       King James translation is "And thou shalt not let any of  thy  seed
       pass  through  the  fire  to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the
       name of thy God: I am the Lord," and Maimonides says this refers to
       passing  an  old  practice  of  passing a newborn child through the
       smoke of a fire as a pagan rite (_T_h_e _G_u_i_d_e _f_o_r _t_h_e _P_e_r_p_l_e_x_e_d,  Part
       3,  Chaper 37).  On the other hand, "Don't mess with someone else's
       ol' man or ol' lady" is probably a better rendering of  the  intent
       than  "Thou  shalt not commit adultery."  (The latter seems to lead
       to all sorts of  hair-splitting  over  the  precise  definition  of
       adultery.)

       I notice, by the way, that while most of the Laws in _L_e_v_i_t_i_c_u_s  are
       retained,  the prohibitions against homosexual behavior between men
       seem to have vanished.  Not only does McCary include all the  other











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 6



       sexual prohibitions ("And the Almighty didn't want folks peeping on
       people they had no  business  seeing  naked";  "It  was  especially
       uncool  to  get  down  with any animals"; "The Almighty didn't want
       kissin' cousins getting hitched, and brothers weren't to sleep with
       their  mothers or any wife of your dad's, whether she's your mother
       or not.  Granddaughters, daughters, and half sisters are out of the
       question  for  doing  the  wild  thing,  just  as your aunt or your
       sister-in-law"), but even the clothing ones ("Mix matching clothes,
       like  wool  and  linen,  isn't  just  a  fashion  downer,  it ain't
       happening here").  One can only conclude that political correctness
       is at least partially responsible for this omission.

       _B_l_a_c_k _B_i_b_l_e _C_h_r_o_n_i_c_l_e_s is certainly an unusual translation, and one
       that  is  surprisingly  engaging.  It manages to bring a life and a
       directness  to  the  story  that  traditional  translations  don't.
       Whether  it  will  reach its intended audience is not clear, but it
       could well find a favorable reception with an audience  looking  at
       it as a literary work rather than an inspirational one.


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                          m.r.leeper@att.com


            The world is a spiritual kindergarten where bewildered
            infants are trying to spell God with the wrong blocks.
                                         -- Edwin Arlington Robinson