@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 06/03/94 -- Vol. 12, No. 49


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are in Middletown 1R-400C
            Wednesdays at noon.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       06/01  GREEN MARS by Kim Stanley Robinson (Hugo Nominee)
       06/22  Hugo-nominated short stories
       07/16  GLORY SEASON by David Brin (Hugo Nominee)
       08/03  MOVING MARS by Greg Bear (Hugo Nominee)
       08/24  VIRTUAL LIGHT by William Gibson (Hugo Nominee)

       Outside events:
       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the second
       Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call 201-933-2724 for
       details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society meets on the third
       Saturday of every month in Belleville; call 201-432-5965 for details.


       HO Chair:     John Jetzt        MT 2G-432  908-957-5087 j.j.jetzt@att.com
       LZ Chair:     Rob Mitchell      HO 1C-523  908-834-1267 r.l.mitchell@att.com
       MT Chair:     Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer        HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 n.j.sauer@att.com
       LZ Librarian: Lance Larsen      HO 2C-318  908-949-4156 l.f.larsen@att.com
       MT Librarian: Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper     MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 e.c.leeper@att.com
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. I was at a science fiction convention recently and saw  somebody
       who had bought packages of trading cards.  It brought back memories
       of my youth to see him eagerly going through a huge stack of  these
       cards  to  see  what  he had gotten.  I sat down near him and asked
       about that they were.  What I got was an education.  Yes, they were
       packaged  and  purchased like trading cards, but they were actually
       cards that are used to play a game called "Magic:  the  Gathering."
       I  was  trying  to figure out what that title could mean--it didn't
       seem to syntax somehow, when he went on to explain the  game.   You
       are  in  a  magic  war and you attack your enemy through the use of
       these  game  cards.   Each  card  changes  rules  like  in   COSMIC
       ENCOUNTER--another  game  that  for  a while was popular at science











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       fiction conventions.  The cards each have  inscriptions  like  "All
       players  and  flying creatures suffer X damage" or "Target creature
       regenerates" or "Target spell  is  countered  four  times  cost  of
       target  spell"  or "All damage from any one source is added to your
       life instead of subtracted."  Well, it is  an  interesting  concept
       that you don't pull the cards from some stack on the game board but
       buy them.  That adds some mystery since you don't know  what  cards
       are out there.

       So far it sounded like an interesting idea.  Nothing too  shocking.
       At  least not yet.  I asked, once you have used a card what happens
       to it?  It stays played and can't be reused.  I suppose it could be
       played  again  in  the  next  game,  but I am not sure this game is
       designed to be played more than once.  One thing still  puzzled  me
       however.   Then I asked THE QUESTION.  "What," I asked, "is to stop
       whoever invests the most money in these cards from  having  a  real
       advantage  over his opponent?"  "Well, nothing.  That's usually how
       it works, in fact."  At first that bothered me  a  little  until  I
       gave it a little bit of thought.  Then it bothered me a lot.  I had
       seen this sort of thing before someplace else.

       This guy Richard Garfield, the inventor  of  the  game,  in  effect
       created several artificial wars so he could sell these cards, which
       are really weapons, to both sides of the conflict.  So how is  this
       guy  any  different  from an arms manufacturer?  Well clearly he is
       different in some fundamental ways, though none that will  win  him
       any  Nobel Peace Prizes.  First, he really does have the ability to
       invent his own little wars.  And there are more than enough fans of
       gaming  who  will  cooperate  with him and fight the wars.  An arms
       merchant doesn't have it quite that easy.  Then when a war  starts,
       Garfield is assured that only he can sell the weapons to each side.
       If anyone else tries, he can scream copyright infringement.  Now  a
       real  arms  manufacturer  actually has to develop and produce arms.
       Garfield just has to think of his weapons and print the ideas up on
       pasteboard.   By  just thinking of the weapon he can make it exist.
       The only thing positive I can say for him is that his weapons don't
       actually kill, they only "play kill" in a game.

       But Garfield has set up a game in which  whoever  has  the  biggest
       bucks  can  buy  himself  a  big  advantage.   That is true of most
       militaries.  And deep down, is that any different from other  walks
       of  life?   Isn't that the American Way?  The basketball player who
       can afford the best shoes has a jump on the player who can't.   The
       college  football  team  who  purchases  the  best  recruit has the
       advantage the one that doesn't.  And it's not just sports.  When  I
       was  in  high  school  the SATs measured aptitude and that was all.
       You had as much as you had and no more.  Then there  was  no  royal
       road  to  aptitude.   But  there were people willing to pay to look
       smarter to the colleges and somebody wanted that money.  I was told
       in  Long  Island  high schools in a certain affluent neighborhood I
       know about, every student took out-of-school courses in how to  ace











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 3



       the SATs.  It is considered a real disadvantage to have to take the
       tests cold like the poor folks do.  These places have statistics to
       prove  they can improve scores.  And I believe it, because any test
       takes some figuring out and adapting to.  If you  think  about  it,
       that  is  built into the scores and is actually part of the measure
       of aptitude--but it is the part  that  someone  can  give  you  the
       answer  sheet  about ... if  you can pay.  Once again it is the guy
       with the big bucks who can  buy  the  appearance  of  aptitude  and
       intelligence.   And it is him who will probably get the high-paying
       jobs, over someone who is less  affluent  but  more  deserving.   I
       think  that explains a lot about what is happening in this country.
       Nobody seems all that upset about SAT-cramming courses.  It is just
       supply  and demand.  Well, I guess you get the society that you are
       willing to settle for.


       ===================================================================

       2. THE HIDDEN LIFE OF DOGS by Elizabeth Marshall Thomas  (Houghton-
       Mifflin,  ISBN 0-395-66968-8, 1993, 148pp, US$18.95) (a book review
       by Mark R. Leeper):

       I find that overall my book  reviews  tend  to  be  a  little  more
       negative than my film reviews.  I think that part of the reason for
       this is that reading a book requires both more time and more effort
       than  seeing a film and I think I may assume that a book should pay
       off in dividends that are proportionately high.   Now  one  of  the
       remarkable  things  is  that some of the books that pay the highest
       dividends  are  some  of  the  shortest  books.   Alan   Lightman's
       _E_i_n_s_t_e_i_n'_s  _D_r_e_a_m_s  was  too  short  to  be  a novel, it was more a
       novella, but it was richer in ideas than any other science  fiction
       book I had read in years.  Curiously most science fiction shops did
       not even carry it, considering it  not  their  thing.   Perhaps  it
       wasn't their thing but it certainly should have been.  That was the
       best fiction book I have read for years.  The best non-fiction book
       is  probably about the same length.  In less than sparse 150 pages,
       Elizabeth Marshall Thomas's _H_i_d_d_e_n _L_i_f_e _o_f  _D_o_g_s.   In  that  short
       space  are  joy, tragedy, science, philosophy, and a generally good
       story.

       Thomas is an anthropologist who is  best  known  for  _T_h_e  _H_a_r_m_l_e_s_s
       _P_e_o_p_l_e,  a  study  of  the !Kung people.  I never actually read the
       book but who can forget a name like !Kung?   Her  studies  of  dogs
       began  when she started to wonder where a dog in her care went when
       he escaped to illegal freedom.  Also she wanted to  understand  his
       need for escape.  She decided to follow Mischa and observe what she
       could from her anthropological insight.  I had a  dog  when  I  was
       growing  up and learned enough about canine behavior to put to rest
       in my mind the foolish myth that dogs think they are human.  Thomas
       does  not even start that basically.  In talking about her dogs she
       sees them as creatures with comprehensible  intellects,  but  still











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 4



       alien.   She  is very candid about the mysteries of canine behavior
       she was able to fathom and those  that  she  could  not.   She  has
       observed,  by  her  reconning  100,000  hours  of  dogs  lives  and
       condensed her experiences into this short book.

       As and example of her writing, in her  introduction  she  says  "Do
       dogs think we're God?  Probably not.  But just as we think of God's
       ways as mysterious, dogs find our ways capricious  and  mysterious,
       often  with  excellent  reason.   Every  day  the  humane societies
       execute thousands of dogs who tried all their  lives  to  do  their
       very best for their owners.  These dogs are killed not because they
       are bad but because they are inconvenient.  So as we need God  more
       than  He  needs  us,  dogs need us more than we need them, and they
       know it."  As I have watched dogs I have seen them  try  to  puzzle
       out our behavior and that seems to be a very accurate observation.

       Thomas makes no societal values when studying  dogs.   Instead  she
       treats  canine  society as if were an unknown human culture.  While
       it  is  clear  that  she  likes  and  respects  dogs,  she  reports
       dispassionately  both  positive  and  negative  aspects  of  canine
       society--some as negative as infanticide.  But as  she  would  with
       humans,  when  she  describes  the  negative  aspects, she tries to
       understand the reasons.  She also describes early in the  book  her
       observations   of   dogs   picking  up  human  characteristics  and
       mannerisms.  As  she  describes  the  lives  of  the  dogs  of  her
       acquaintance  her narrative takes on some of the characteristics of
       an epic novel spanning three generations, though of course  not  as
       many years as if they were human generations.  When she says what a
       dog is feeling, she usually will tell you her evidence, but it does
       not lessen the impact.

       It is difficult to describe this book without making it  sound  too
       much  like  _W_a_t_e_r_s_h_i_p _D_o_w_n or even _L_a_d_y _a_n_d _t_h_e _T_r_a_m_p.  You have to
       read it to understand how keenly observed the book is.  But  it  is
       definitely  recommended and will forever come to mind when you have
       interactions with dogs in the future.


       ===================================================================

       3. The schedule for book discussions has been slightly re-arranged,
       since   David  Brin's  _G_l_o_r_y  _S_e_a_s_o_n  has  just  been  released  in
       paperback.  [-ecl]


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                          m.r.leeper@att.com