@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 06/10/94 -- Vol. 12, No. 50


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are in Middletown 1R-400C
            Wednesdays at noon.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       06/22  Hugo-nominated short stories
       07/13  GLORY SEASON by David Brin (Hugo Nominee)
       08/03  MOVING MARS by Greg Bear (Hugo Nominee)
       08/24  VIRTUAL LIGHT by William Gibson (Hugo Nominee)

       Outside events:
       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the second
       Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call 201-933-2724 for
       details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society meets on the third
       Saturday of every month in Belleville; call 201-432-5965 for details.


       HO Chair:     John Jetzt        MT 2G-432  908-957-5087 j.j.jetzt@att.com
       LZ Chair:     Rob Mitchell      HO 1C-523  908-834-1267 r.l.mitchell@att.com
       MT Chair:     Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       HO Librarian: Nick Sauer        HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 n.j.sauer@att.com
       LZ Librarian: Lance Larsen      HO 2C-318  908-949-4156 l.f.larsen@att.com
       MT Librarian: Mark Leeper       MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       Factotum:     Evelyn Leeper     MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 e.c.leeper@att.com
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. At this writing we are  just  back  from  Baltic  Europe  and  I
       thought  you might find of interest some comments I made on my last
       trip, to India when I went to see a sort of horror film in Hindi.

       During the Great Depression when people were working long hours for
       small rewards, the film industry decided that people need glamor in
       their lives.  Movies  became  more  glamorous  and  movie  theaters
       became movie palaces.  You paid your few cents for a ticket and you
       entered a world of opulence.  Most of the palaces are  now  history
       or  falling  apart.   In  India, however, where the world's largest
       film industry still thrives, the concept of  the  movie  palace  is
       still  going  strong.   The Raj Mandir in Jaiput is the second-best
       theater in all of Asia according to the Lonely Planet guide.  It is











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       an  impressive  building,  with mirrored interiors, pink decor, and
       rounded rampways to higher floors.  The theater's capacity is about
       1300 people.  As we approached, a huge movie board announced it was
       showing Kumar's KHAL-NAAIKAA.  For as little as Rs7 for  the  front
       row  to  Rs18  for  the  Diamond Box, you can see a film on the big
       screen (about twenty-five feet high and fifty feet wide).  [A rupee
       is  about  three cents.] We each got into line.  They have separate
       lines for men and women.  No hanky-panky in line!  The women's line
       went  faster  so  Evelyn  bought  the  tickets.  We went inside and
       admired the interiors for a while, then the lights dimmed.

       KHAL-NAAIKAA is about two-and-a-half hours long and  the  plot  was
       not  hard  to follow even if it was entirely in Hindi.  What helped
       especially was what  Evelyn  pointed  out  how  familiar  the  plot
       actually was.  This was Bombay's two-and-a-half-hour musical remake
       of THE HAND THAT ROCKS THE CRADLE.  Now we never  bothered  to  see
       this film, but we did hear what the plot was and it was pretty much
       all there, including the governess's weird motive for her evil  and
       even  a  greenhouse  murder  that exactly repeated the scene in the
       coming attraction for the American film.  Just why anyone  needs  a
       greenhouse in India would be anybody's guess.  Mr. Kumar is not one
       to take only partial advantage of the unenforcibility of  copyright
       law.  He is a very thorough thief.  But what about is this about it
       being a musical?  Well, just about all Indian  films  are  musicals
       regardless  of  subject  matter.  This was the very first psychotic
       killer musical we had ever seen, but we bet others in the  audience
       had  seen more than enough psycho-killer musicals.  Before I get to
       the film itself, I want to mention one more thing about the theater
       itself.   The  ceiling  of  the screening room is highly fluted and
       apparently at least two birds were nesting there and at inopportune
       times  would  fly  in  front  of  the screen.  Kumar was often very
       creative in how he put in his production numbers.  The  heroine  is
       singing  a  production  number  on  television at one point and the
       villainess reaches into the television screen  and  pulls  out  the
       heroine  and  the  two sing together.  A second grab at the heroine
       causes her to fall back into the screen.  All during this scene the
       Venetian  blinds, which are white on one side and red on the other,
       flash from red to white  and  back.   Rececca  DeMornay  is  fairly
       attractive  and the part calls for her to be seductive.  The Indian
       woman who plays the same role does fill the bill.

       One of the things that helps the understanding is that there  is  a
       lot  of  English  language  used in the film.  Scenes in a doctor's
       office are in English and a fair number of English phrases are used
       at  odd  moments.   People say, "I love you," in English.  It seems
       odd to come to Jaipur to see a version of THE HAND THAT  ROCKS  THE
       CRADLE,  but  you  do learn a fair amount about Indian culture from
       the experience and it is a comfortable and pleasant three hours.


       ===================================================================











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 3



       2. VAMPIRES AND  VIOLETS  by  Andrea  Weiss  (Penguin,  ISBN  0-14-
       023100-5,  1993,  184pp,  US$12.50)  (a  book  review  by Evelyn C.
       Leeper):

       Subtitled "Lesbians in Film," this work is  obviously  written  for
       the  academic  audience.   Though  its lengthy discussion of female
       vampire films might initially attract a less intellectual  audience
       (I  admit  I  was  first  interested  in it because someone said it
       contained a long section on Hammer's vampire films), passages  such
       as  "One  way the narrative structure enforces these cultural myths
       is  by  closing   down   the   range   of   possible,   alternative
       interpretations  that spectators can read from the film" are likely
       to warn off the casual reader who was  expecting  another  book  on
       horror  films aimed at the teenage reader.  And in fact the vampire
       chapter is only one part of _V_a_m_p_i_r_e_s _a_n_d _V_i_o_l_e_t_s, which begins with
       a  look  at the portrayal of lesbians in the silent and early sound
       cinema, continues through the 1930s (focusing primarily on Dietrich
       and  Garbo),  post-World-War-II  films,  and  art  and  independent
       lesbian cinema.

       Not surprisingly, many of Weiss's observations and  interpretations
       deal  with  the  role  of women in general in film.  She frequently
       discusses the intent of the studio to attract and please  the  male
       (heterosexual)  viewer  while  also  pointing out the director's or
       female actor's or even lesbian viewer's attempts  to  subvert  this
       intent.   Dietrich  in  _M_o_r_o_c_c_o  may  dress  in a tuxedo and kiss a
       female nightclub patron as  part  of  her  character's  attempt  to
       seduce  a man, but viewers can also read the kiss as being the real
       Dietrich momentarily showing through her character.

       The basic text for people interested in gay and lesbian  images  in
       film  remains  Vito  Russo's  _C_e_l_l_u_l_o_i_d  _C_l_o_s_e_t.  (And indeed Weiss
       frequently quotes Russo and  gives  him  special  acknowledgement.)
       But   Russo's   book   deals   more  with  the  portrayal  of  male
       homosexuality in film than female.  For example, Dietrich gets  two
       sentences  in Russo's 276-page book versus a dozen pages as well as
       additional mentions in Weiss's 180-page  one.   This  is  due  more
       likely  to  the  dearth  of  archival material on films with female
       leads than to bias on Russo's part.  (Weiss discusses some  of  the
       difficulties  she  had  in viewing some of the films, or in finding
       subsidiary material, so this is not unlikely.)  On the other  hand,
       it  is  reasonable  to  assume  that  Russo  would  be  more likely
       subconsciously to write about the films he was most familiar  with,
       and  those  would  be  those dealing with male homosexuality.  (The
       basic text on vampires in Hammer's films,  by  the  way,  would  be
       David Pirie's _H_e_r_i_t_a_g_e _o_f _H_o_r_r_o_r.)

       _V_a_m_p_i_r_e_s _a_n_d  _V_i_o_l_e_t_s  is  a  book  that  will  appeal  only  to  a
       specialized  niche  audience,  and  for  its audience it serves its
       purpose moderately well.  There are  no  amazing  new  insights  or
       revelations  here.   Weiss chooses to analyze a few films in detail











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 4



       rather than to provide a list of films with  lesbian  images.   She
       succeeds in that, I believe, but in doing so does not write for the
       masses.


       ===================================================================

       3. THE BLUE KITE (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

            Capsule review:  The  life  of  one  Chinese  family
            through  fourteen  years  of  political  upheaval is
            chronicaled in this moving but very  downbeat  film.
            It was censored in China, not too surprisingly.  The
            film  lacks  focus  at  times,  but  many   of   the
            situations  are  haunting  and  the film is a moving
            indictment of politics  out  of  control  in  Maoist
            China.  Rating: low +2 (-4 to +4).

       _T_h_e _B_l_u_e _K_i_t_e is the fictional autobiography of the first  fourteen
       years of Chen Tietou's life in Mainland China.  The story goes from
       Tietou's parents' marriage in 1953 up  through  the  start  of  the
       Cultural  Revolution  in  1967.  Tietou remembers himself as having
       been a particularly difficult child, but  the  problems  he  caused
       were  small  next  to  the  family's  political troubles.  Tietou's
       family is perfectly loyal to the country and  is  not  particularly
       political,  yet  it  still  torn  apart  repeatedly  and eventually
       destroyed by the vagaries of a powerful, repressive and  capricious
       political  system.  Much of what happens in the early parts of this
       film will remind Americans of McCarthyism.  Yet the fact that these
       are  just  ordinary people, not celebrities or people in the public
       eye, reminds the  viewer  at  how  much  pervasive  the  drive  for
       political  correctness  was  in  China than it ever has been in the
       United States.  The Chens are loyal enough to the  government  that
       they  feel  impelled  to bow to the picture of Mao at their wedding
       and sing patriotic songs.  It is very clear these of not  political
       activists. They are good hard-working people who believe in Mao and
       his policies for China.

       Encouraged by a government policy  anxious  to  root  out  its  own
       problems,  Tietou's  father is willing to discuss with friends what
       things needed change.  When this Hundred Flowers policy is replaced
       by   a  government  stance  more  paranoid,  local  officials  turn
       viciously on Tietou's family.  Repeatedly we see  people's  loyalty
       to  the government betrayed.  The country is so anxious to root out
       supposed traitors that they give the weapon of political  ostracism
       to  anybody  who  finds  it  convenient to use it.  In one chilling
       sequence schoolboys are  tired  of  school  so  they  accuse  their
       teacher  of  being  a counter-revolutionary and have her humiliated
       and dragged away.  It takes little to be accused of being  disloyal
       and once accused there is little chance of being vindicated.












       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 5



       The film is 139 minutes long and  follows  Chen  Shujuan,  Tietou's
       mother,  through  three marriages and many life experiences, mostly
       ending in misery either because of the system's  inadequacies,  and
       its political paranoia.

       Some aspects of this film would have played  better  to  a  Chinese
       audience.   An  important  part  of  this film, presumably, are the
       political slogans and posters one sees as in the background of many
       of  the  scenes.  Only occasionally are the signs translated in the
       subtitles, but the viewer gets the feeling that a lot  was  missed.
       Still  there  is the compensation that we get a view into town life
       in China that is probably more of interest to  Westerners  than  to
       Chinese.   I  would  give  _T_h_e  _B_l_u_e  _K_i_t_e a low +2 on the -4 to +4
       scale.


       ===================================================================

       4. WIDOWS' PEAK (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

            Capsule review:  The peace of a small post-WWI Irish
            village  is  shattered  by  the feud of two women in
            this  picturesque  comedy.   As  with  many   recent
            British  films, the setting is the real star of this
            film.  The plot twists are not as mysterious as they
            were  intended  to  be.  Rating: high +1 (-4 to +4).
            WARNING: A VERY HEAVY SPOILER FOLLOWS THE REVIEW.

       In the 1920s, Kilshannon, Ireland, is  a  town  dominated  by  rich
       widows.   The  hill  at  the center of the town has been given over
       entirely to the women and has been dubbed  "Widows'  Peak"  by  the
       locals.  Of the elder female contingent, first among equals is Mrs.
       Doyle Couniha (played by Joan Plowright).   The  one  non-widow  on
       Widow's  Peak  is  Katherine O'Hare (Mia Farrow) who was adopted by
       the other widows after an indiscretion earlier in her life.  O'Hare
       is a quiet mousey woman who uncharacteristically takes an immediate
       dislike to  newcomer  Edwina  Broome  (Natasha  Richardson).   Even
       before  Broome's  arrival  O'Hare is finding reason to hate her and
       soon the two women are constantly at each others' throats, quite to
       the bemused amazement of Kilshannon.

       The screenplay of _W_i_d_o_w_s' _P_e_a_k was written years  ago  for  Maureen
       O'Hara  to  play  O'Hare  and  for Mia Farrow to play Broome.  Time
       passed and Farrow took the role originally written for her  mother.
       It  is  really a pity it was not cast that way since O'Hara had the
       fiery personality of O'Hare.  One side effect is that Farrow has to
       sound  Irish  and  Richardson  has to sound American.  It would not
       have been nearly as difficult for Farrow to sound American and  her
       mother  to  sound  Irish.   Also,  Farrow  is  far  too  quiet  and
       introspective for the role.   Richardson  has  a  teaspoonful  more
       personality, but neither actress can wrest the audience's attention











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 6



       from Plowright.  Adrian Dunbar of _H_e_a_r _M_y _S_o_n_g  is  present  but  a
       real  disappointment  in  a  role  that  gives him little chance to
       fulfill the promise he showed in that film.

       One odd note, the film steals a joke from _C_a_s_a_b_l_a_n_c_a.   In  a  film
       set  after  1943,  it  would  have been considered a film allusion.
       _W_i_d_o_w_s' _P_e_a_k is set in the 1920s and that makes it a theft.

       John Irvin directs taking maximum advantage of the small Irish town
       location.  He builds texture into the film showing us scenes around
       the town, taking us to a local dance and to the town's regatta.  He
       almost  has  Bill  Forsyte's ability for making the town itself the
       star, but his town does not have quite  enough  personality  to  be
       really  interesting.   Now and again he does get off a clever piece
       of local color, like a fairly witty scene of all the widows in town
       visiting  their  husbands'  graves  at the same time, but it is not
       quite enough to make the town really engaging.

       This is a film that is never so  tricky  as  intended,  but  it  is
       always watchable and usually quite fun.  I give it a high +1 on the
       -4 to +4 scale.

       SPOILER...SPOILER...SPOILER...SPOILER...







































       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 7



       What I found to be the greatest flaw in this film is what  was  for
       me  almost  its  utter  predictability.   I  knew  that  there were
       surprises coming, admittedly, but I  have  to  say  I  figured  the
       entire plot before we even saw the character of Mrs. Broome.  I saw
       Miss O'Hare behaves peculiarly negatively about the coming of  Mrs.
       Broome,  I  thought  of  the  demographics  of the area, and I knew
       exactly what was  happening.   Even  then  it  seemed  to  me  that
       Richardson  was  giving  too  much  away  by  making  Mrs. Broome a
       terrible actress.  (Okay, there were details about what  was  going
       on  that  were not available until later, but even there I was well
       ahead of the script.)  In would not be fair to  downrate  the  film
       because  I  guessed  too early what was happening, but I think they
       could have done a better job of misleading me once I knew.


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                          m.r.leeper@att.com









































































               THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT ALMOST BLANK