@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 08/19/94 -- Vol. 13, No. 8


       MEETINGS UPCOMING:

       Unless otherwise stated, all meetings are in Middletown 1R-400C
            Wednesdays at noon.

         _D_A_T_E                    _T_O_P_I_C

       08/20  Movie: THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL (Saturday night, 8PM, RSVP)
       08/24  Book: VIRTUAL LIGHT by William Gibson (Hugo Nominee)
       08/27  Movie: *No film this week*
       09/03  Movie: *No film this week*
       09/10  Movie: WAR OF THE WORLDS (Saturday night, 8PM, RSVP)
       09/14  Book: A CONNECTICUT YANKEE IN KING ARTHUR'S COURT by Mark Twain
                       (Classics)
       09/17  Movie: INVADERS FROM MARS (Saturday night, 8PM, RSVP)
       09/24  Movie: PHANTOM FROM SPACE (Saturday night, 8PM, RSVP)
       10/05  Book: MINING THE OORT by Frederik Pohl (tentative)
       10/26  Book: INTERVIEW IWTH A VAMPIRE by Anne Rice (movie tie-ins)
       11/16  Book: FRANKENSTEIN (Classics *and* movies tie-ins)

       Outside events:
       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the second
       Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call 201-933-2724 for
       details.  The New Jersey Science Fiction Society meets on the third
       Saturday of every month in Belleville; call 201-432-5965 for details.


       MT Chair:        Mark Leeper   MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       HO Chair:        John Jetzt    MT 2G-432  908-957-5087 j.j.jetzt@att.com
       HO Co-Librarian: Nick Sauer    HO 4F-427  908-949-7076 n.j.sauer@att.com
       HO Co-Librarian: Lance Larsen  HO 2C-318  908-949-4156 l.f.larsen@att.com
       MT Librarian:    Mark Leeper   MT 3D-441  908-957-5619 m.r.leeper@att.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist:
                        Rob Mitchell  MT 2D-536  908-957-6330 r.l.mitchell@att.com
       Factotum:        Evelyn Leeper MT 1F-329  908-957-2070 e.c.leeper@att.com
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       1. A reminder: Though the issue is mailed out by Evelyn Leeper, the
       lead  editorial  is  always  written  by  Mark  Leeper.   Responses
       regarding  it  will  get  to  him  faster  if  sent   directly   to
       Mark.Leeper@att.com.   Each  review  is  labeled  with the author's











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 2



       name.


       ===================================================================

       2. The next meeting will  be  to  discuss  the  last  of  the  Hugo
       nominees,  William  Gibson's _V_i_r_t_u_a_l _L_i_g_h_t.  This book is available
       in paperback.  After this, we will  return  to  some  more  classic
       titles  (see  schedule  above).   Note  that some of the dates were
       printed incorrectly in the last  issue,  and  have  been  corrected
       here.


       ===================================================================

       3. If anyone in New Jersey can record WBAI (99.5 FM) from 4 AM to 6
       AM on Tuesday, Aug 30, I would greatly appreciate it.  I would like
       to get parts 4-6 of a 6-part BBC science fiction series, "Aliens of
       the  Mind."  The program actually runs alternate weeks from 3:30 AM
       to 6 AM but they start with about 40-50 minutes of the  most  gawd-
       awful  music they can find.  (Obviously unless you are a real night
       owl, this would mean setting up a timer on Monday evening.  If  you
       already  have your VCR set up to do simulcast recording, that would
       work.)

       If anyone can do this, let Evelyn or me know before Tuesday, August
       23,  and we can provide you with the necessary blank tapes.  And of
       course, we can make you a copy of the first three parts if you want
       to hear them.


       ===================================================================

       4. When August with its sweet showers comes, Evelyn and I  like  to
       go the Renaissance Festival.  It is a ninety-minute drive each way,
       but it is a sort of tradition.   These  festivals  have  themselves
       become   a  tradition  in  many  parts  of  the  country.   Novato,
       California, had one we have gone to.  it  is  sort  of  a  literary
       equivalent  of  a county fare, or at least should be.  It is also a
       place where all sorts of  handicrafts  venders  show  their  wares,
       where  you can get a turkey leg to go, a glass of mead, cappuccino,
       or even falafel.

       The nearest Renaissance Festival I know of is in Tuxedo, New  York.
       It  is a sort of a fair dedicated to English literature of the 16th
       Century.  Of course in the United States  most  people  don't  know
       what exactly is and is not Renaissance or what literature is and is
       not English.  The result is the festival will have, along with  its
       enactment  of  Shakespeare,  plays based on stories by Boccaccio or
       Chaucer or anyone else they can get away with.  The people  working
       at  the  festival  dress in period clothing and talk in whences and











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 3



       forsooths.  Generally it is a pretty good time.

       The festival has one centerpiece for the  literary-minded,  another
       for the sports-minded.  The latter is a joust.  I am sure it is not
       a full-fledged with knights knocking each other off of horses,  but
       I   have   admittedly  never  attended  the  joust.   The  literary
       centerpiece of the Tuxedo festival is  a  Shakespeare  play.   Last
       year  it  was  _A _M_i_d_s_u_m_m_e_r _N_i_g_h_t'_s _D_r_e_a_m and this year the play was
       _T_h_e _M_e_r_r_y _W_i_v_e_s _o_f _W_i_n_d_s_o_r.  I  suspect  it  is  always  a  comedy,
       though   do   not  have  a  large  sampling.   While  much  of  the
       entertainment is not all that well done--usually it  owes  more  to
       vaudeville   than  to  classical  drama--the  Shakespeare  play  is
       performed by  members of Actors' Equity and they do a  professional
       job.   Evelyn and I generally figure we are paying for the play and
       consider the rest to be free warm-up act.  Part of this  warmup  is
       usually a ribald play, either based on a fabliau by Chaucer or some
       sexy story by Boccaccio.  Generally the sort of story they pick  is
       not  all  that  different  from  the stories that cable shows every
       month or so at midnight--the only difference is that the  stuff  on
       the cable shows nudity and is a sort of pretentious soft-core porn.
       At the festival the actors are content to let the works convey  the
       story, and that way they are not shut down.

       This year the warm-up play was "The Merchant's  Tale"  by  Geoffrey
       Chaucer ... not  a  very good story.  It involves an old knight who
       marries a young woman  who  is  more  interested  in  the  knight's
       handsome  young  squire.   Chaucer contrives to have the young two-
       some in a tree with the knight looking on.  Yet by guile the knight
       is  tricked  into  disbelieving  what  he  has  seen.   Much of _T_h_e
       _C_a_n_t_e_r_b_u_r_y _T_a_l_e_s is more on  the  level  of  dirty  jokes  than  of
       serious  literature.   There  was  one  clever piece of set design.
       There are two beds that have pictures painted on the  upside  where
       the  pictures  cannot  be  seen.   When the action moves out to the
       orchard, the beds are turned on end to reveal paintings of trees in
       the orchard.  The prop becomes the backdrop.  There even seem to be
       steps hidden from the audience so that action can even  take  place
       up  in  the  tree.  Even for the minor plays there are professional
       actors who in this case are better than the material, in  spite  of
       its classic sources.

       There are all  sorts  of  little  skits  going  on  throughout  the
       fairgrounds.   There  will  be  a procession of the Queen here or a
       juggler there.  They are less than careful to keep  all  the  names
       from  the  16th Century.  They have Robin Hood wandering around and
       someone else will take a name from the Round Table.  We seem to  be
       someplace  where all of pre-18th Century English history has fallen
       together to a single point in time, but you can still  buy  fajitas
       and  iced cappuccino.  The idea that you can eat a fajita, paid for
       with a Visa card, and watch Merlin rub shoulders  with  Robin  Hood
       gives  the proceedings dubious Elizabethanality.  In some ways they
       would make it less authentic  if  they  could,  I  am  sure.   With











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 4



       honest-to-gosh  real horses wandering around, it is still necessary
       to watch your step on some of the paths.  But they do have  someone
       come around and clean up such messes.

       Of course, there are many of the usual vendors  one  might  expect.
       One is selling historical-style hats, and many sell jewelry.  There
       is a vendor selling so-called "New Age" books, here with some  sort
       of  tacit admission that New Age thought is really old, and in fact
       old superstition.  There is also a vendor devoted to face-painting.
       I  have  my  doubts  about  the  authenticity  of  this  particular
       Elizabethan service.  It strikes me as  being  neither  Elizabethan
       nor  a  service.   Another vendor rents Elizabethan costumes or the
       sort the staff wears.  I  wonder  if  McDonalds  could  make  money
       renting  out  aprons  and hats.  In any case at the fair, of course
       you find some people coming in home-made costumes also.  We  passed
       one woman who was trying to train others to repeat her motto, "I am
       not half dead, I am half alive.  Be optimistic."  That was  on  our
       way  to  see  the  second  dramatic presentation, this one aimed at
       children.  It was the Bennington Puppets in "The Magic Ring."   The
       story  is  based on the _N_i_b_e_l_u_n_g_e_n_l_i_e_d, just like Wagner's "Ring of
       the Nibelungs."  In this case the ring gives  immortality,  but  in
       the  short  play it is stolen from "sea sprites" whose conversation
       implies an intellect so light it is surprising their heads did  not
       go  bobbing  to the surface of the water.  The fault is clearly not
       the sprites' but whoever was foolish enough to entrust anything  of
       value  to them.  The ring is stolen by Alberich who is subsequently
       eaten by a dragon in trying to hide his prize.  Siegfried  is  then
       called  upon  to get the ring back from the dragon.  Alberich had a
       problem with his puppet joints so his left elbow stuck up  next  to
       his  ear.  It was clear the puppeteer was trying to untangle it but
       it would not come un-kinked.  So Alberich was a bit  more  deformed
       than  usual.   The  verbal  part  of the play was pre-recorded with
       music (not Wagner), narration and dialog.  The  problem  with  this
       was  that  they  knew  all  too well in advance that the puppeteers
       might have problems setting up scenes and so they left long musical
       intervals between the scenes.  That tended to slow the pacing down.
       To make a long story short, they took a very short story  and  made
       it  seem long.  While the puppets came recommended by a friend, the
       presentation was lackluster and at times even dull with many  false
       moves.   The  presentation showed the kind of indifference one gets
       when a rote task has been repeated too often.

       Following the puppet show we went early to  the  Shakespeare  play,
       _T_h_e  _M_e_r_r_y  _w_i_v_e_s  _o_f  _W_i_n_d_s_o_r.   At  least  two of the actors were
       familiar from last year's production of _A _M_i_d_s_u_m_m_e_r _N_i_g_h_t'_s  _D_r_e_a_m.
       As  far as the dignity of Shakespeare's plays, this one gets a sort
       of mid-range respectability.  It has no great  themes  and  is  not
       wildly  imaginative.  It was written, it is thought, just to please
       Queen Elizabeth who said she  wanted  to  see  a  third  play  with
       Falstaff.  It is said to have the least poetry of any of the Bard's
       plays.  It is, in fact, just a sort of a situation comedy in  which











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 5



       Falstaff  woos two rich women at the same time, but they have their
       revenge on him.  The plot gives plenty of opportunity for horseplay
       on  stage  and  comic  histrionics.   I  was front row close to the
       center which had the advantage of putting much of the action almost
       in  my  lap.   It  had  its downside, however.  There is a scene in
       which Falstaff is startled in the middle of a  drink  of  ale.   He
       sprays  it  out.   I and the woman across the center aisle took the
       brunt of the action when the actor under-estimated his spray power.
       And it wasn't just a drop or two either.  There was no warning that
       "this play gets you wet" but I certainly was.

       Well, with that somewhat over-lusty entertainment over, we  decided
       to  as  usual  forego  the  joust.  and bid a fond farewell to this
       unorthodox Elizabethan England, with a bit of Arthurian and Johnian
       and  Elizabeth-2ian  England  as  well  as Clintonian United States
       mixed in.


       ===================================================================

       5. I am sorry to say that Peter Cushing has passed away.  He was  a
       British  actor  who specialized in fantasy and horror films, making
       many films for Hammer Films of Britain.  His best-known role was as
       the  Grand  Moff  Tarkin  in STAR WARS.  Cushing made a lot of good
       films and he made a lot of films good.  Even in bad films he always
       gave the best performance possible.  A partial filmography follows:
              Abominable Snowman of the Himalayas, The (aka Abominable Snowman)
              Alexander the Great  [Memnon]
              Asylum
              At the Earth's Core
              Black Knight, The
              Brides of Dracula, The
              Creeping Flesh, The
              Curse of Frankenstein, The
              Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. (aka Invasion Earth 2150 A.D.)
              Dr. Phibes Rises Again
              Dr. Terror's House of Horrors  [Doctor Schreck]
              Dr. Who and the Daleks
              Dracula A.D. 1972 (aka Dracula Today)
              Evil of Frankenstein, The
              Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell  [Baron Frankenstein]
              Frankenstein Created Woman
              Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed!  [Baron Frankenstein]
              From Beyond the Grave
              Gorgon, The
              Great Houdinis, The (TV)
              Hamlet (1948)  [Osric]
              Helen Keller: The Miracle Continues (TV)  [Professor Charles Copeland]
              Hellfire Club, The
              Horror Express  [Dr. Wells]
              Horror of Dracula (aka Dracula (1958))  [Doctor Van Helsing]











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 6



              Hound of the Baskervilles, The (1959)  [Sherlock Holmes]
              House That Dripped Blood, The
              Howards of Virginia, The
              Island of Terror
              Island of the Burning Doomed (aka Island of the Burning Damned)
              John Paul Jones
              Legend of the Werewolf
              Magic Fire
              Man in the Iron Mask, The (1939)
              Man Who Finally Died, The
              Moulin Rouge  [Racing Fan]
              Mummy's Shroud, The (voice)
              Mummy, The (1959)
              Night Creatures (1962) (aka Captain Clegg)  [Doctor Blyss]
              Revenge of Frankenstein, The
              Risk, The (1961)
              She (1965)
              Sherlock Holmes and the Masks of Death (TV)
              Skull, The  [Maitland]
              Star Wars  [Grand Moff Tarkin]
              Sword of Sherwood Forest
              Sword of the Valiant
              Tale of Two Cities, A (1980) (TV)
              Tales from the Crypt  [Grimsdyke]
              Torture Garden
              Twins of Evil  [Gustav Weil]
              Uncanny, The
              Vampire Lovers, The


       ===================================================================

       6. OTHERNESS by David Brin  (Bantam  Spectra,  ISBN  0-553-29528-4,
       1994, 368pp US$5.99) (a book review by Evelyn C. Leeper):

       This is Brin's second collection (his  first  being  _T_h_e  _R_i_v_e_r  _o_f
       _T_i_m_e.  also  available from Bantam), and contains thirteen stories,
       five essays, and three articles entitled "Story Notes."  The latter
       are  a  departure  from  the  usual  "preface  each  story  with an
       introductory  paragraph"  approach.   Instead,  they  combine   the
       commentary   for  all  the  stories  and  essays  in  each  section
       ("Transitions," "Contact," and "Cosmos"; the sections  "Continuity"
       and  "Otherness"  have no story notes).  For some reason, the notes
       are in the _m_i_d_d_l_e of the sections.  Maybe Brin wants  to  make  his
       comments  after  the  reader  has  finished some of the stories but
       before she has started others.  However,  it  breaks  the  flow  of
       reading the book, sort of like heading down a straight road only to
       discover it suddenly  makes  an  abrupt  ninety-degree  turn.   (Of
       course,  maybe  the  whole idea is that a collection _s_h_o_u_l_d_n'_t flow
       the same way as a novel.  After all, the stories were  all  written
       at different times.  Maybe they should be read that way too.)











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 7



       But Brin (or someone) has gathered and grouped  the  stories  here,
       and  so  we  have  to  look  at  what  we have.  The first section,
       "Transitions," contains the stories "The Giving Plague"  (nominated
       for a Hugo), "Myth Number 21," "Mr. Pak's Preschool," and "Detritus
       Affected," along with story notes  and  the  essay  "The  Dogma  of
       Otherness."   "Myth  Number  21"  is not even really a story, but a
       250-word "drabble" from his novel _E_a_r_t_h.  A "drabble" is supposedly
       a  super-short  story.   The  problem  is, this isn't a story.  The
       other stories are indeed about transitions,  and  Brin  is  a  good
       story-teller, if at times a bit preachy.  The latter characteristic
       comes through even more in the essays, of course,  though  he  does
       point  out  the  interesting  paradox  in  "valuing  diversity" and
       "cultural  relativity."   His  focus  reminds  me  of  Kim  Stanley
       Robinson,    although   their   approaches   to   the   issues   of
       environmentalism  and  human  relationships  are  very   different.
       (Robinson  has  more emphasis on history as a character and a force
       than Brin has, for example.)

       The second  section,  "Contact,"  contains  the  stories  "Sshhhh,"
       "Those  Eyes," "Bonding to Genji," and "The Warm Space"; the essays
       "What to Say to a UFO" and "Whose Millennium?";  and  story  notes.
       All  of  these  are  alien  contact stories, though not necessarily
       first  contact  stories.   "Sshhhh"  seems  inspired  by  something
       similar  to  what  produced  "The Giving Plague"--a similar concept
       underlies them both.  "The Warm Space" reads like a story  John  W.
       Campbell  would  have  loved, but unlike most of Brin's other work.
       It's  also  the  oldest  piece   here,   so   the   difference   is
       understandable.  What "Whose Millennium?" is doing in the "Contact"
       section is not clear unless  Brin  thinks  of  it  as  being  about
       human-God contact.

       The next section,  "Continuity,"  has  no  story  notes,  just  two
       stories--"NatuLife  (R)"  and  "Piecework"--and  the essay "Science
       versus Magic."  (The "(R)" would be an "R" in a circle if  I  could
       do  that  in  ASCII.)   The stories are about the continuity of the
       human race, but the essay seems to be here because  (to  paraphrase
       the old joke) "everything gotta be somewhere."

       In the "Cosmos" section, Brin  seems  to  leave  his  story-telling
       roots  behind  and  move  into concentrating on style in "Bubbles,"
       "Ambiguity," and "What Continues ... and What Fails ...."  I  found
       these less rewarding than the earlier stories, but your mileage may
       vary.

       The final article, "The New Meme," is in part an elaboration on his
       earlier  essay "The Dogma of Otherness" in which Brin proposes five
       basic memes of civilization:  feudalism,  machismo,  paranoia,  the
       East,  and Otherness.  (Brin is certainly not a slavish follower of
       parallel constructions in English.)  My  major  problem  with  this
       essay  is  that  it tries to cover two concepts, which are in large
       part independent: that of memes, and that of  the  basic  competing











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 8



       world-views.  Each should probably have its own separate essay.

       Brin is a major author and his stories are usually  worth  reading.
       But  the  confusing  structure  and  spotty quality make it hard to
       recommend this collection except to readers who  are  already  Brin
       fans.


       ===================================================================

       7. SUMMER OF LOVE by Lisa Mason (Bantam Spectra, ISBN  0-553-37330-
       7, June 1994, 400pp, US$12.95) (a book review by Evelyn C. Leeper):

       Why is this a science fiction novel?

       Yes, I know it's because a time traveler from the 25th Century  has
       come  to San Francisco in the summer of 1967 to ensure that certain
       events occur which  will  save  the  world  from  total  ecological
       catastrophe.  But since this part of the plot is the worst executed
       and most predictable aspect of the whole novel, and since it  could
       be removed entirely without hurting the rest of the novel--in fact,
       probably improving it--one wonders why it's  there.   My  guess  is
       that  Mason  tried  to  sell  a straight "Summer of Love" novel and
       couldn't find a publisher for it, so she added the science  fiction
       element to make it more marketable.

       The result is an odd book, which is reasonably good as a look  back
       at  the  "Summer  of Love" in both its good and its bad aspects (at
       least as far as I can tell--I spent the summer of 1967 in Chicopee,
       Massachusetts,  doing  volunteer  work  in  the library), but fails
       badly as a science fiction novel.  It's full of references to "Star
       Trek"  and  other  science fiction, including references to all the
       works it's  imitating,  so  in  case  you  didn't  realize  it  was
       predictable, it reminds you!  Recommended if you want to read about
       San Francisco  in  1967  (and  can  ignore  the  science  fictional
       aspect), but _n_o_t as a science fiction novel.


       ===================================================================

       8. CORE by Paul Preuss (AvoNova, ISBN 0-380-71182-6,  August  1994,
       394pp, US$5.99) (a book review by Mark R. Leeper):

       It seems like a long time since I had seen a hard science book that
       is  about--predominantly  about--geology.  Paul Preuss's _C_o_r_e looks
       from the blurbs to be an updating of _J_o_u_r_n_e_y _t_o _t_h_e _C_e_n_t_e_r  _o_f  _t_h_e
       _E_a_r_t_h with an expedition to the fiery bowels of the earth.  In fact
       the exact words are "a reborn dream of an incredible expedition  to
       the  center  of  the  Earth.   In  fact, that is misleading.  It is
       really about digging a core hole  deep  into  the  Earth.   (Preuss
       obviously runs the risk of having his book reviewed with the phrase











       THE MT VOID                                                  Page 9



       "one long bore.")  This project can  only  be  completed  with  the
       author  inventing  a  substance  strong  enough  to  withstand  the
       pressures of the dig, Hudderite, named for Cyrus Hudder, the father
       of  Leiden  Hudder,  the main character.  The use of geology rather
       than physics or biology as a science to build the story around  and
       the  introduction  of new super-materials like "Hudderite" give the
       novel a marvelous pulpish feel that somewhat  compensates  for  not
       being taken on a journey into the core.

       What is not as well handled is the basic mystery of the father  and
       son  relationship.   It  seems  that Cyrus Hudder committed suicide
       under mysterious circumstances  and  Leiden  is  as  interested  in
       finding  out  what  happened  to  Pop  as he is in digging into the
       Earth.  The story keeps jumping around in time, telling the history
       of both Leiden and Cyrus.  The story is also artificially tied into
       current event to add excitement that the author apparently  assumes
       would  be  missing from the scientific part of the story.  There is
       mystery here, but nothing greatly unpredictable.  One suspects that
       Preuss   thinks  that  modern  audiences  are  less  interested  in
       scientific discovery than in pyrotechnics.

       Another problem I had with the book was its setting of some  events
       in  1985  that clearly did not happen then.  In specific there is a
       lethal solar flare.  The  copyright  date  is  1993  with  a  first
       printing in this edition in August, 1994.  (Odd, as of this writing
       it is still only July.)  I suppose it is fashionable these days  to
       write  alternate  histories,  but  you would think the author would
       have more alternation than  that.   In  spite  of  that  one  small
       problem  _C_o_r_e is a lot more like novels written in the 60s than the
       90s, which as far as I am concerned is not a bad thing.

       Preuss seems to have done his homework and  along  with  the  basic
       story  the  reader  does get a small education in geology.  He also
       has given some thought as to the corollary  application  of  a  big
       whole in the ground.  The cover quotes "New York Newsday" as saying
       that the book has believable characters.  Personally I  found  them
       to  be just a bit pulpish, but recognize that I probably am willing
       to sacrifice my demands for characters if I am  entertained,  learn
       something,  and  have  an  imaginative science plot.  To that end I
       would say that _C_o_r_e, with its faults (no pun intended) is still one
       of the more enjoyable books I have read in a while.


       ===================================================================

       9. WEIRD TALES FROM SHAKESPEARE edited by Katharine Kerr and Martin
       H.  Greenberg  (DAW, ISBN 0-88677-605-8, July 1994, 318pp, US$4.99)
       and ALIEN PREGNANT BY ELVIS edited by Esther M. Friesner and Martin
       H.  Greenberg  (DAW, ISBN 0-88677-610-4, June 1994, 319pp, US$4.99)
       (book reviews by Evelyn C. Leeper):












       THE MT VOID                                                 Page 10



       The idea of "theme" anthologies is certainly nothing new.  But they
       are  usually  on more mundane or predictable themes--first contact,
       alternate Presidents, even cats and horses.  And it used to be that
       anthologies  were  of  older stories culled from magazines, stories
       that were written because the authors wanted to  write  them.   Now
       they're  commissioned--twenty-three  authors are told, "I'm looking
       for stories on a Shakespearean theme."  (Actually, it's  more  than
       twenty-three--I  forget the multiplier someone once said was needed
       to get the right number of usable  stories.)  The  result  of  this
       newer mode of operation is often a collection of stories that would
       not have sold in the open, undirected market.  Not that the stories
       are  necessarily  bad,  mind  you,  but they are getting points for
       being on-topic that get them accepted in anthologies  but  wouldn't
       help  otherwise.   Resnick  seems to do the best job of keeping the
       story quality up  in  his  anthologies  (maybe  that's  why  he  is
       nominated for the Best Editor Hugo this year).

       Now I would have expected thirty-eight stories in _W_e_i_r_d _T_a_l_e_s  _f_r_o_m
       _S_h_a_k_e_s_p_e_a_r_e, but I guess Kerr couldn't get anyone to agree to write
       a science fiction or fantasy story based  on  _C_o_r_i_o_l_a_n_u_s.   Nor  is
       this  "the  alternate Shakespeare," though both Kerr's introduction
       and the back cover blurb make that claim.  The first section  could
       have  gone that way, with its stories with the Bard as a character,
       but none of them are alternate histories.  These are among the best
       stories  in  the  book with Diana L. Paxon's "Augmentation of Dust"
       especially worthy of note.   (Nitpick  to  the  editors:  pick  one
       version  of the author's name and stick to it.  Is it "Diana Paxon"
       or "Diana L. Paxon"?)

       Section two deals with the tragedies: _H_e_n_r_y _I_V, _P_a_r_t  _I_I  from  the
       Welsh  point  of  view,  _H_a_m_l_e_t from Gertrude's point of view, _K_i_n_g
       _L_e_a_r from the Fool's point of view, _K_i_n_g _L_e_a_r in a  computer,  _K_i_n_g
       _L_e_a_r  on an alien planet.  After a while the pattern (either retell
       the story from another point of view, do _L_e_a_r, or both)  begins  to
       wear.

       The introduction to the next section implies that the comedies  are
       being  covered,  but  instead  it's a selection of humorous stories
       about non-comedies: _H_a_m_l_e_t from the point of  view  of  the  skull,
       another  story about William Shakespeare, _T_i_t_u_s _A_n_d_r_o_n_i_c_u_s done for
       an alien audience, a vampiric _R_o_m_e_o _a_n_d _J_u_l_i_e_t, and Shakespeare  in
       general  from  the  point  of view of Hollywood.  Of these only the
       last--Mike Resnick's "The  Summer  of  My  Discontent"--tickled  _m_y
       funny bone.

       Section four has unusual  workings  of  Shakespeare's  themes:  _T_h_e
       _T_e_m_p_e_s_t  from  Caliban's  point  of  view,  _t_w_o  re-workings of the
       Rosalind/Orlando theme, a genuine alternate _R_o_m_e_o _a_n_d _J_u_l_i_e_t, and a
       look  at  _A _M_i_d_s_u_m_m_e_r _N_i_g_h_t'_s _D_r_e_a_m.  Section five is a look at the
       future (but several stories in other sections  did  that  already):
       another  Shakespeare performed for aliens and two very good pieces-











       THE MT VOID                                                 Page 11



       -Gregory Benford's "Not of an Age"  and  Adrienne  Martine-Barnes's
       "The Elements So Mixed."

       You may have noticed that the only stories I thought worthy of note
       were  those  with  Shakespeare  as  a character (either on- or off-
       stage)--stories about how he got started as a writer, his universal
       appeal,   etc.   Whenever  authors  try  to  re-tell  Shakespeare's
       plays ... well, let's just say they're  no  Shakespeares.   Authors
       such  as Barry Malzberg and Brian Aldiss don't turn in clunkers, of
       course, but even their talent suffers by comparison to Shakespeare.
       Some  ideas sound better in the conception than they turn out to be
       in their execution and _W_e_i_r_d _T_a_l_e_s _f_r_o_m _S_h_a_k_e_s_p_e_a_r_e may be  one  of
       them.   (If  you  are a specialist on Shakespeare your mileage will
       almost certainly vary, though in which direction I cannot tell.)

       And to coin a phrase, from the sublime to the ridiculous....

       _A_l_i_e_n _P_r_e_g_n_a_n_t _b_y _E_l_v_i_s  is  an  anthology  of  thirty-six  stories
       commissioned on the theme of tabloid journalism.  The  problem here
       is that the tabloids are so bizarre that  trying  to  top  them  is
       pretty  much an exercise in futility.  (Anyone who has been reading
       Mark Leeper's comments on various news stories knows that  this  is
       rapidly  becoming  true  of "real" news as well.)  The best stories
       here don't try.  Lawrence Watt-Evans's "The Bride  of  Bigfoot"  is
       about  what  might  happen  if someone took these stories seriously
       (with echoes of Kim Stanley Robinson and _H_a_r_r_y _a_n_d _t_h_e _H_e_n_d_e_r_s_o_n_s).
       "Bob" Bes Shahar's "Is Your Coworker a Space Alien?" is a much more
       serious look at the question than you'll find in the  _W_e_e_k_l_y  _W_o_r_l_d
       _N_e_w_s.   Thomas  F. Monteleone's  "Group  Phenomena" could have been
       written  by  Fredric  Brown  John  DeChancie's  "Hitler  Clone   in
       Argentina  Plots  Falklands Reprise" has a definite "Twilight Zone"
       feel, and Bruce Boston's "How Alien He Really Was" is the flip-side
       of a well-known "Twilight Zone" episode.

       I assume "Saving Sam's Used UFO's" (Kate Daniel) is right down  the
       road  from  Harry's  All-Night  Hamburgers.   Greg  Cox's  "Danny's
       Excellent Adventure" is cute, but Dan Quayle jokes  are  wearing  a
       bit  thin.   Of  the  rest--well,  they  ranged from unmemorable to
       unreadable.

       Well, as they say, it seemed like a good idea at the time....


       ===================================================================

       10. DOOMSDAY GUN (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

            Capsule review:  Once again HBO's docu-dramas  prove
            that there are good films being made for cable.  The
            story of Gerald Bull and his  attempts  to  build  a
            super-gun  for  Saddam  Hussein's  pre-war  Iraq was











       THE MT VOID                                                 Page 12



            under-reported in the press, in spite of the natural
            fascination of the material.  This film is a sort of
            _T_u_c_k_e_r-meets-Tom-Clancy based on fact.   Rating:  +2
            (-4 to +4)

       I think I  have  a  special  fondness  for  HBO  docudramas.   They
       generally  have  a  good  feel  for  how  to  make  recent  history
       engrossing and dramatic.  Whether they choose to base  it  on  pre-
       existing  material,  as  they did in last years adaptation of Randy
       Shilts's _A_n_d _t_h_e _B_a_n_d _P_l_a_y_e_d _O_n, or whether they  write  their  own
       story  based on research as they did with _D_e_a_d _A_h_e_a_d, their quality
       is generally more than a rival for what is playing in the theaters.

       With _D_e_a_d _A_h_e_a_d they had their work cut out for them.  This was the
       story  of  the  Exxon  Valdez  disaster  and  the  politics of what
       followed.  It is not easy to make that material really  engrossing,
       and they managed.  _D_o_o_m_s_d_a_y _G_u_n suffers from no such handicap.  The
       story of Gerald Bull and his super-gun already has the  makings  to
       be  Tucker-meets-Tom-Clancy.   Add  to that the fact that the story
       was really was under-reported in the press and you  have  a  fairly
       engrossing piece of entertainment.

       Frank Langella plays Gerald Bull, a child-man  with  a  fascination
       with  large artillery pieces and the engineering intellect to build
       the guns that he dreams about.  His inspiration since  boyhood  has
       been Jules Verne's _F_r_o_m _t_h_e _E_a_r_t_h _t_o _t_h_e _M_o_o_n with its cannon large
       enough to send a  shell  and  its  passengers  to  the  moon.   The
       Canadian  has  built  guns  for  the  United States and many of its
       allies, including Israel,  whom  he  helped  to  defend  the  Golan
       Heights.  After a falling out with the Americans he decides that he
       will sell his services and that of his small  organization  to  the
       highest  bidder  ("except the Russians").  The highest bidder turns
       out to be Saddam Hussein who is militarizing and  fortifying  Iraq.
       Alan   Arkin   plays  an  Israeli  intelligence  officer  with  the
       uncomfortable job of convincing a friend and  former  ally  not  to
       built his gun and place it in the hands of Hussein.  Meanwhile Bull
       has to get the industrialized nations to build the parts  he  needs
       under  the noses of their own intelligence agencies.  Then there is
       the larger story of how  much  governments'  intelligence  agencies
       knew and even had complicity in the arming of Iraq.

       If you go into _D_o_o_m_s_d_a_y _G_u_n expecting _C_l_e_a_r _a_n_d _P_r_e_s_e_n_t _D_a_n_g_e_r, you
       are  sure  to  be  disappointed.  But if you are expecting a modest
       little made-for-cable film, you will probably  be  very  pleasantly
       surprised.  _D_o_o_m_s_d_a_y _G_u_n ranks very well with what is in release in
       theaters.  If you consider all  the  boxing  matches  and  stand-up
       comics  ad  nauseum  that  made-for-cable  fare  is becoming on the
       "premium" services, _D_o_o_m_s_d_a_y _G_u_n at least shows that  some  quality
       material  is  still  being made.  I would give _D_o_o_m_s_d_a_y _G_u_n a +2 on
       the -4 to +4 scale.












       THE MT VOID                                                 Page 13



       ===================================================================

       11. THE SLINGSHOT (a film review by Mark R. Leeper):

            Capsule review:  This is the story of a very  bright
            boy growing up in Stockholm early this century.  The
            Socialist activism of both his parents and the  fact
            his  mother  is Jewish make him the butt of bullying
            from all directions.  Still he  manages  to  survive
            and bounce back.  Rating: +2 (-4 to +4)

       Roland is a boy growing up in Stockholm in the 1920s (or  so)  with
       just   about  everything  going  against  him.   His  father  is  a
       Socialist, his mother is a Russian Jew fighting an  illegal  battle
       for  family  planning.   Roland's father is an autocrat with little
       empathy for the boy.  Roland's teachers are anti-Semitic and  anti-
       Socialist  and  have little use for the boy except as a bad example
       and as  a  target  for  occasional  sadistic  corporal  punishment.
       Roland's schoolmates cheat, exploit, and play cruel tricks on young
       Roland.  And in spite of all  this,  Roland  has  an  irrepressible
       spirit.  He sometimes does fight back, but chooses his fights where
       he thinks they will do the most good.  He also has an ingenious and
       a creative mind.  The story always has the feel of an autobiography
       of somebody who achieved something great later in life.   In  fact,
       it  is  the  adaptation  of a semi-autobiographical novel by Roland
       Schutt, so we know he at least became a  novelist.   The  book  was
       adapted for the screen and directed by Ake Sandgren.

       _T_h_e _S_l_i_n_g_s_h_o_t takes its title from one of many  applications  young
       Roland finds for the condoms that his mother illegally distributes.
       Without understanding the actual purpose for  the  devices,  he  is
       able  to  see  in  them and improvise several unexpected uses, each
       only getting him into deeper trouble.  One keeps expecting somebody
       to  notice the genius of the ten-year-old, much as the boy comes to
       be appreciated in _M_y _L_i_f_e _a_s _a _D_o_g, but this is  not  a  film  with
       simple  answers  and  obvious scenes.  Roland's rewards will be far
       more abstract and not so dependent on others.

       Jesper Salen stars as Roland and manages a better performance  with
       more depth than many better-recognized actors in this country give.
       Many actors his age just read lines and go through some motions for
       the  camera.   Jesper's  acting is intelligent and convincing.  You
       always have a feeling that  there  really  are  intelligent  mental
       processes behind his actions.  Stallen Skarsgard plays Fritiof, the
       father who thinks himself a great liberal thinker but who runs  his
       family like a despot.

       While the film leaves the character of Zipa (Basia Frydman) at  the
       stereotypical  loving mother level, we do get to know a lot more of
       Roland's father.  He is harsh and demanding of  his  sons.   He  is
       determined  not  to  let a spinal condition, which is slowly taking











       THE MT VOID                                                 Page 14



       away his ability to walk, undermine his control on his family.   He
       is a walking (or nearly so) contradiction trying to hold on to some
       of the values of the past while trying to change the  social  order
       of  his  country.   He  despises  the  government while envying the
       trappings of being the king--trappings that he  gets  a  chance  to
       sample for himself.

       Roland is not a victim of the Holocaust and he lives in  a  country
       not  generally associated with discrimination and bigotry.  But the
       prejudice he faces is clearly a major part of forming his character
       and  his  ability to remain strong and to rebound still makes for a
       moving story which I give a +2 on the -4 to +4 scale.


       ===================================================================

       12. THE SECRET FILES OF  SHERLOCK  HOLMES  by  June  Thomson  (Otto
       Penzler  Books,  ISBN 1-883402-36-0, 1993 (1990c), 224pp, US$20) (a
       book review by Evelyn C. Leeper):

       Many authors have turned their hands at writing stories to go  with
       the  various  passing  references  in the canonical Sherlock Holmes
       adventures.  The latest  is  June  Thomson,  who  has  taken  seven
       apocryphal  stories  and  given  them form.  (Of course, she claims
       that they were actually manuscripts by Watson found by his niece.)

       "The Case of the Vanishing Head-Waiter" is based on a reference  in
       "The  Problem  of  Thor  Bridge": "A problem without a solution may
       interest the student, but can  hardly  fail  to  annoy  the  casual
       reader.    Among  these  unfinished  tales  is  that  of  Mr. James
       Phillimore, who, stepping back  into  his  own  house  to  get  his
       umbrella,  was  never  more seen in this world."  Well, there was a
       solution, which was suppressed (to protect the  principals  of  the
       case),  but  it  is  perhaps a bit pat and the trick of how someone
       could so "vanish" has been used in previous attempts  to  elaborate
       on  the Phillimore reference.  (In all these stories some reason is
       given as to _w_h_y they are "secret" files.)

       "The Case  of  the  Amateur  Mendicants  Society"  is  based  on  a
       reference  in  "The  Five  Orange Pips": "The year '87 furnished us
       with a long series of cases of greater or less interest, of which I
       retain the records.  Among my headings under this one twelve months
       I find an account of the adventure of the Paradol Chamber,  of  the
       Amateur  Mendicant  Society, who held a luxurious club in the lower
       vault of a furniture warehouse, of the  facts  connected  with  the
       loss of the British bark Sophy Anderson, of the singular adventures
       of the Grice Patersons in the island of Uffa, and  finally  of  the
       Camberwell  poisoning  case."  There isn't much mystery here--other
       than a red herring.  In this case, the  case  was  kept  secret  to
       protect the family honor of the principals.












       THE MT VOID                                                 Page 15



       "The Case of the Remarkable Worm" is based on another reference  in
       "The  Problem of Thor Bridge": "A third case worthy of note is that
       of Isadora Persano, the well-known journalist and duellist, who was
       found  stark  staring  mad  with  a match box in front of him which
       contained a remarkable worm said to be unknown to science."  Again,
       the  mystery  is  minimal  (except perhaps how a man got the female
       first name "Isadora")  and  like  many  other  renditions  of  this
       apocryphal  tale, ends up making Watson's canonical reference to it
       totally inaccurate.  This one was supposedly kept secret because it
       was   one  of  Holmes's  failures,  but  other  failures  had  been
       published, so that is not entirely convincing.

       "The Case of the Exalted Client" is based on yet another  reference
       in  "The  Problem  of  Thor  Bridge":  "Apart from these unfathomed
       cases, there are some which involve the secrets of private families
       to  an  extent  which  would  mean  consternation  in  many exalted
       quarters if it were thought possible that they might find their way
       into  print.   I  need  not say that such a breach of confidence is
       unthinkable, and that these records will be separated and destroyed
       now  that  my  friend has time to turn his energies to the matter."
       (Although apparently they were not.)  This is perhaps  the  weakest
       of  the  seven  stories with apparent holes in logic that are never
       explained.

       "The Case of the Notorious Canary Trainer" is based on a  reference
       in  "The  Adventure of Black Peter": "In this memorable year '95, a
       curious  and  incongruous  succession  of  cases  had  engaged  his
       attention,  ranging  from  his  famous  investigation of the sudden
       death of Cardinal Tosca--an inquiry which was carried out by him at
       the  express desire of His Holiness the Pope--down to his arrest of
       Wilson, the notorious canary-trainer, which removed  a  plague-spot
       from  the  East End of London."  Again, we have a story predictable
       from  almost  the  very  beginning,  due  in  large  part  to   the
       introductory explanation of why the story has been kept secret.

       "The Case of the Itinerant Yeggman" is based on a reference in "The
       Adventure of the Sussex Vampire": "'Voyage of the Gloria Scott,' he
       read.  'That was a bad business.  I have some recollection that you
       made  a  record  of it, Watson, though I was unable to congratulate
       you upon the result.  Victor Lynch, the forger.  Venomous lizard or
       gila.    Remarkable   case,  that!   Vittoria,  the  circus  belle.
       Vanderbilt and the  Yeggman.   ...'"   This  is  another  concealed
       failure, though here at least Holmes says he doesn't want a certain
       party to realize he's on to him, giving at  least  some  reason  to
       hold back publication.

       "The Case of the Abandoned Lighthouse" is based on a  reference  in
       "The Adventure of the Veiled Lodger": "I deprecate, however, in the
       strongest way the attempts which have been made lately  to  get  at
       and  to  destroy  these  papers.   The  source of these outrages is
       known, and if they are repeated I have Mr. Holmes's  authority  for











       THE MT VOID                                                 Page 16



       saying   that  the  whole  story  concerning  the  politician,  the
       lighthouse, and the trained cormorant will be given to the  public.
       There is at least one reader who will understand."  Here the reason
       for secrecy is national security,  yet  by  today's  standards  the
       whole  scenario  is  ludicrous and even then better methods to pass
       information could have been employed.

       One nice touch in the stories is that occasionally when Holmes asks
       Watson  if the latter can leave his practice for a day, Watson says
       he cannot.  On the whole, the characterizations are reasonably true
       to  the  Canon  and  the  settings  have  the  right feel (though I
       question if Watson would accompany a guest to Mrs Hudson's rooms to
       get her some tea).  But the thinness of the mysteries makes it hard
       to recommend this book.


                                          Mark Leeper
                                          MT 3D-441 908-957-5619
                                          m.r.leeper@att.com


            Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity,
            and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
                                          -- Joseph Heller